Re: [PATCH 1/6] kthread: Add the helper macro kthread_run_on_cpu()

[Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>]

On 21 10月 21 09:58:58, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 21:53:12 +0800
> Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * kthread_run_on_cpu - create and wake a cpu bound thread.
> > > > + * @threadfn: the function to run until signal_pending(current).
> > > > + * @data: data ptr for @threadfn.
> > > > + * @cpu: The cpu on which the thread should be bound,
> > > > + * @namefmt: printf-style name for the thread. Format is restricted
> > > > + *	     to "name.*%u". Code fills in cpu number.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Description: Convenient wrapper for kthread_create_on_node()
> > > > + * followed by wake_up_process().  Returns the kthread or
> > > > + * ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM).
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define kthread_run_on_cpu(threadfn, data, cpu, namefmt)		  \  
> > > 
> > > Why is this a macro and not a static inline function?
> > > 
> > > -- Steve  
> > Hi,Thanks for your feedback,
> > 
> > I think using static inline function is nice, but here try to keep
> > consistent with the other macros,
> > sush as kthread_create/kthread_init_work...
> 
> Which they did because they didn't want to use va_list to have variable
> arguments, which you don't have.
> 
> Which begs the question, should you?
> 
> -- Steve
Hi, Thanks your reply.

I get it, V3 here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211022025711.3673-2-caihuoqing@baidu.com/

Thanks,
Cai