From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC277C433FE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94F260FC4 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230230AbhJ1QWn (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:22:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57398 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229925AbhJ1QWm (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:22:42 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D19C061570; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id l24-20020a9d1c98000000b00552a5c6b23cso9294594ota.9; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:20:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qpc8jpsWVpJyk0cd0OJ7nlpLB5oumfHlBGc3n3seh8I=; b=RC6Wxlkoq2dVLklq2Jk0LTN1s8376mQdC+nJuxnPTooIzwe/azssI5ZCo6oAhn9Mz9 OLjq7/lFO+NU0yvCOSoxzkSuhOUYDeBZ018jLgsyDO8rKmVfT8Qh1spxipVAC0HIJhAm EFWknDA6C11qJLmSKc7JcdpR37UD1p9EoazsmzGGAuP7ad0oykv0aWd8b2+mPOPvX8Nv A0y55TNc7w6NWO86Jm0r44hAlHJ/2Smh1YCIbk/DQk33+3Or4x9rAd5MxH8PHaKx4CzU +tR/Txani8LyXkcWIWsOdRy6VzxoJr5pXBznTP771dpn+dFttGy6IgVb2SPBF42hl8su 0UXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qpc8jpsWVpJyk0cd0OJ7nlpLB5oumfHlBGc3n3seh8I=; b=X5lo3zDoHhEq5JNrDVjqF9KTKFWCb7GQ+Ci8a5NTtfSeya0Dv2WYW6ztVb2KHkEDUo 8LVQFH+xfDS3WiTzvgrrq1ZwzpolLzKUIDKJk5N2CUwkjadrQcB33x1xIvItohWHTTGm k28+sd/7pXMo8VPzreGcz3fx/RqcBwYit3hgr7MRKcWGwEAojZOpExfXnEf973g2y/7m 9SpiKLnnzjbfXn8ZnMuWU/cJq91hrkXFHUUR2X8CzQH6/+gFfFboyHQznz+n/e5Pvz5o XGr9G35TGR52jhgednlxS18a9hZDNUz80UjF/YS8SD7oWtwXs3D+TEgyOClXOi5/S9V9 +LbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304xRrvKK1IsanUgoYQw8OPlvBOBOu/Ephs1xacZP/WAcEHJGM0 SxmRtCTMTL/lPE3ylA14ZkO4CmQSkl0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvi/sN32vb6BiJI0UOAyMHnmRji434S5M676KNZTpq8px/UHWPV6+07ie7eBpBdoujIFAHew== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:669:: with SMTP id 96mr4176377otn.224.1635438015002; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p133sm1150001oia.11.2021.10.28.09.20.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:20:12 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: "Wilson, David T. (GSFC-5870)" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Potential issue with smb word operations for tmp461 device in tmp401 driver Message-ID: <20211028162012.GA470146@roeck-us.net> References: <7f334e4c-0e71-2005-854f-c2d4e068ef85@roeck-us.net> <3923f61f-031c-f293-dfbd-8db7efbce2cb@roeck-us.net> <8485a422-31b2-6d9f-516c-29d60fd13490@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:54:01AM +0000, Wilson, David T. (GSFC-5870) wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > Like last time, I updated several files in my platform's v5.4 files and applied your three patches. > From what I can tell, I'm having no problems with the tmp461's basic support in the modified lm90 driver. > > Thanks again for looking into this, I ordered an evaluation board from TI to be able to test improved support for TMP461 in the lm90 driver (actual chips are all but impossible to get, unless I am willing to wait for 9+ months). There are still some issues with negative temperatures in standard mode and, as you noticed, with resolution. I do have a board with TMP451 (which doesn't support negative temperatures in standard mode), but that doesn't help with the TMP461 specifics. I'll keep you posted. Guenter