From: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: goldstein.w.n@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, luto@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1] arch/x86: Improve 'rep movs{b|q}' usage in memmove_64.S
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 23:49:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211101044955.2295495-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> (raw)
Add check for "short distance movsb" for forwards FSRM usage and
entirely remove backwards 'rep movsq'. Both of these usages hit "slow
modes" that are an order of magnitude slower than usual.
'rep movsb' has some noticeable VERY slow modes that the current
implementation is either 1) not checking for or 2) intentionally
using.
All times are in cycles and measuring the throughput of copying 1024
bytes.
1. For FSRM, when 'dst - src' is in (1, 63] or (4GB, 4GB + 63] it is
an order of magnitude slower than normal and much slower than a 4x
'movq' loop.
FSRM forward (dst - src == 32) -> 1113.156
FSRM forward (dst - src == 64) -> 120.669
ERMS forward (dst - src == 32) -> 209.326
ERMS forward (dst - src == 64) -> 118.22
2. For both FSRM and ERMS backwards 'rep movsb' is always slow. Both
of the times below are with dst % 256 == src % 256 which mirrors
the usage of the previous implementation.
FSRM backward -> 1196.039
ERMS backward -> 1191.873
As a reference this is how a 4x 'movq' performances:
4x Forward (dst - src == 32) -> 128.273
4x Backward -> 130.183
Signed-off-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.S | 28 ++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.S b/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.S
index 64801010d312..9d5f3ec4db04 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.S
@@ -39,7 +39,16 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__memmove)
/* FSRM implies ERMS => no length checks, do the copy directly */
.Lmemmove_begin_forward:
- ALTERNATIVE "cmp $0x20, %rdx; jb 1f", "", X86_FEATURE_FSRM
+ /*
+ * Don't use FSRM 'rep movsb' if 'dst - src' in (0, 63] or (4GB, 4GB +
+ * 63]. It hits a slow case which is an order of magnitude slower.
+ */
+ ALTERNATIVE "cmp $0x20, %rdx;"
+ "jb 1f;"
+ "mov %edi, %ecx;"
+ "sub %esi, %ecx;"
+ "cmp $63, %ecx;"
+ "jb 3f;", "", X86_FEATURE_FSRM
ALTERNATIVE "", "movq %rdx, %rcx; rep movsb; retq", X86_FEATURE_ERMS
/*
@@ -89,23 +98,6 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__memmove)
jmp 13f
.Lmemmove_end_forward:
- /*
- * Handle data backward by movsq.
- */
- .p2align 4
-7:
- movq %rdx, %rcx
- movq (%rsi), %r11
- movq %rdi, %r10
- leaq -8(%rsi, %rdx), %rsi
- leaq -8(%rdi, %rdx), %rdi
- shrq $3, %rcx
- std
- rep movsq
- cld
- movq %r11, (%r10)
- jmp 13f
-
/*
* Start to prepare for backward copy.
*/
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-01 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-01 4:49 Noah Goldstein [this message]
2021-11-01 18:59 ` [PATCH v2] arch/x86: Improve 'rep movs{b|q}' usage in memmove_64.S Noah Goldstein
2021-11-02 23:15 ` [PATCH v3] " Noah Goldstein
2021-11-17 21:02 ` [PATCH v4] " Noah Goldstein
2021-11-17 22:31 ` David Laight
2021-11-17 22:45 ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-19 22:31 ` David Laight
2021-11-20 0:05 ` Noah Goldstein
2021-12-10 18:35 ` Noah Goldstein
2022-01-12 3:13 ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-10 9:08 ` Noah Goldstein
2022-03-16 14:15 ` Noah Goldstein
2022-03-16 16:23 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211101044955.2295495-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
--to=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox