From: alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kan.liang@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com,
alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] Fix IIO event constraints for Snowridge
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:03:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211115090334.3789-4-alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211115090334.3789-1-alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com>
From: Alexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com>
According to the latest uncore document, DATA_REQ_OF_CPU (0x83),
DATA_REQ_BY_CPU (0xc0) and COMP_BUF_OCCUPANCY (0xd5) events have
constraints. Add uncore IIO constraints for Snowridge.
Fixes: 210cc5f9db7a ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add uncore support for Snow Ridge server")
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
index 9aba4ef77b13..3660f698fb2a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -4529,6 +4529,13 @@ static void snr_iio_cleanup_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
pmu_iio_cleanup_mapping(type, &snr_iio_mapping_group);
}
+static struct event_constraint snr_uncore_iio_constraints[] = {
+ UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x83, 0x3),
+ UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc0, 0xc),
+ UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xd5, 0xc),
+ EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
+};
+
static struct intel_uncore_type snr_uncore_iio = {
.name = "iio",
.num_counters = 4,
@@ -4540,6 +4547,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type snr_uncore_iio = {
.event_mask_ext = SNR_IIO_PMON_RAW_EVENT_MASK_EXT,
.box_ctl = SNR_IIO_MSR_PMON_BOX_CTL,
.msr_offset = SNR_IIO_MSR_OFFSET,
+ .constraints = snr_uncore_iio_constraints,
.ops = &ivbep_uncore_msr_ops,
.format_group = &snr_uncore_iio_format_group,
.attr_update = snr_iio_attr_update,
--
2.21.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-15 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-15 9:03 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Several fixes for event constraints on SKX and SNR platforms alexander.antonov
2021-11-15 9:03 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] Fix filter_tid mask for CHA events on Skylake Server alexander.antonov
2021-11-17 13:59 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/uncore: " tip-bot2 for Alexander Antonov
2021-11-15 9:03 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] Fix IIO event constraints for " alexander.antonov
2021-11-17 13:59 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/uncore: " tip-bot2 for Alexander Antonov
2021-11-15 9:03 ` alexander.antonov [this message]
2021-11-17 13:59 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix IIO event constraints for Snowridge tip-bot2 for Alexander Antonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211115090334.3789-4-alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com \
--to=alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox