public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
	Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] staging: r8188eu: remove test code for efuse shadow map
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:43:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211115154326.GF27562@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211115135044.zzudkdypmgivfnko@viti.kaiser.cx>

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:50:44PM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Thus wrote Dan Carpenter (dan.carpenter@oracle.com):
> 
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 07:55:06PM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> 
> > > -			if (_SUCCESS == ret)
> > > -				goto exit;
> > > -		}
> > > +		if (_SUCCESS == ret)
> > > +			return;
> > >  	}
> > > -	Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf, bPseudoTest);
> 
> > It looks like this changes how the code works here.  Originally we
> > called Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E() fir rtw_IOL_applied() was false or if
> > iol_read_efuse() failed.
> 
> the call to Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E is still there, it's below the part
> that you quoted:
> 
> -       Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf, bPseudoTest);
> -
> -exit:
> -       return;
> -}
>  
> -static void ReadEFuse_Pseudo(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 _offset, u16 _size_byte, u8 *pbuf, bool bPseudoTest)
> -{
> -       Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf, bPseudoTest);
> +       Hal_EfuseReadEFuse88E(Adapter, _offset, _size_byte, pbuf);
>  }
> 
> The removal of ReadEFuse_Pseudo makes the diff a bit confusing. When I
> checked the patches before posting, I stumbled across this part as well.

Oh...  Sorry.  I should have seen that.  Thanks!

regards,
dan carpenter


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-15 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-13 18:55 [PATCH 00/15] staging: r8188eu: more efuse cleanup Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 01/15] staging: r8188eu: remove efuse type from definition functions Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 02/15] staging: r8188eu: remove efuse type from read functions Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 03/15] staging: r8188eu: remove test code for efuse shadow map Martin Kaiser
2021-11-15 11:27   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-11-15 13:50     ` Martin Kaiser
2021-11-15 15:43       ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 04/15] staging: r8188eu: merge small adapter info helpers Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 05/15] staging: r8188eu: rtl8188e_EfuseGetCurrentSize is now unused Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 06/15] staging: r8188eu: rtl8188e_Efuse_PgPacketRead " Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 07/15] staging: r8188eu: merge Efuse_ReadAllMap into EFUSE_ShadowMapUpdate Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 08/15] staging: r8188eu: use efuse map length define directly Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 09/15] staging: r8188eu: rtl8188e_EFUSE_GetEfuseDefinition is unused Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 10/15] staging: r8188eu: remove defines for efuse type Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 11/15] staging: r8188eu: efuse_OneByteRead is unused Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 12/15] staging: r8188eu: efuse_OneByteWrite " Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 13/15] staging: r8188eu: remove bt efuse definitions Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 14/15] staging: r8188eu: remove fake efuse variables Martin Kaiser
2021-11-13 18:55 ` [PATCH 15/15] staging: r8188eu: remove the efuse_hal structure Martin Kaiser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211115154326.GF27562@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
    --cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox