[PATCH 5.14 793/849] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-15T23:22:55Z

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

commit 3e067fd8503d6205aa0c1c8f48f6b209c592d19c upstream.

When UBSAN is enabled, the code emitted for the call to guest_pv_has
includes a call to __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value. objtool
complains that this call happens with UACCESS enabled; to avoid
the warning, pull the calls to user_access_begin into both arms
of the "if" statement, after the check for guest_pv_has.

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3222,9 +3222,6 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm
}

st = (struct kvm_steal_time __user *)ghc->hva;
- if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
- return;
-
/*
* Doing a TLB flush here, on the guest's behalf, can avoid
* expensive IPIs.
@@ -3233,6 +3230,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm
u8 st_preempted = 0;
int err = -EFAULT;

+ if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
+ return;
+
asm volatile("1: xchgb %0, %2\n"
"xor %1, %1\n"
"2:\n"
@@ -3255,6 +3255,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm
if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
goto dirty;
} else {
+ if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
+ return;
+
unsafe_put_user(0, &st->preempted, out);
vcpu->arch.st.preempted = 0;
}