From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Haren Myneni <haren@us.ibm.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] crypto: add zbufsize() interface
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 19:51:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202112011947.7FA0A587C@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211202015820.GB8138@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 12:58:20PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 03:39:06PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I'm looking at this again because of the need in the module loader
> > to know "worst case decompression size"[1]. I am at a loss for how (or
> > why) the acomp interface is the "primary interface".
>
> This is similar to how we transitioned from the old hash interface
> to shash/ahash.
>
> Basically the legacy interface is synchronous only and cannot support
> hardware devices without having the CPU spinning while waiting for the
> result to come back.
>
> If you only care about synchronous support and don't need to access
> these hardware devices then you should use the new scomp interface
> that's equivalent to the old compress interface but built in a way
> to allow acomp users to easily access sync algorithms, but if you
> are processing large amounts of data and wish to access offload devices
> then you should consider using the async acomp interface.
But the scomp API appears to be "internal only":
include/crypto/internal/scompress.h:static inline int crypto_scomp_decompress(struct crypto_scomp *tfm,
What's the correct API calling sequence to do a simple decompress?
> > For modules, all that would be wanted is this, where the buffer size can
> > be allocated on demand:
> >
> > u8 *decompressed = NULL;
> > size_t decompressed_size = 0;
> >
> > decompressed = decompress(decompressed, compressed, compressed_size, &decompressed_size);
> >
> > For pstore, the compressed_size is fixed and the decompression buffer
> > must be preallocated (for catching panic dumps), so the worst-case size
> > needs to be known in advance:
> >
> > u8 *decompressed = NULL;
> > size_t decompressed_worst_size = 0;
> > size_t decompressed_size = 0;
> >
> > worst_case(&decompressed_worst_size, compressed_size);
> >
> > decompressed = kmalloc(decompressed_worst_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > ...
> > decompressed_size = decompressed_worst_size;
> > decompress(decompressed, compressed, compressed_size, &decompressed_size);
> >
> >
> > I don't see anything like this in the kernel for handling a simple
> > buffer-to-buffer decompression besides crypto_comp_decompress(). The
> > acomp interface is wildly over-complex for this. What the right
> > way to do this? (I can't find any documentation that discusses
> > compress/decompress[2].)
>
> I think you're asking about a different issue, which is that we
> don't have an interface for on-the-go allocation of decompressed
> results so every user has to allocate the maximum worst-case buffer.
>
> This is definitely an area that should be addressed but a lot of work
> needs to be done to get there. Essentially we'd need to convert
> the underlying algorithms to a model where they decompress into a
> list of pages and then they could simply allocate a new page if they
> need extra space.
>
> The result can then be returned to the original caller as an SG list.
>
> Would you be willing to work on something like this? This would benefit
> all existing users too. For example, IPsec would no longer need to
> allocate those 64K buffers for IPcomp.
>
> Unfortunately not many people care deeply about compression so
> volunteers are hard to find.
Dmitry has, I think, a bit of this already in [1] that could maybe be
generalized if it'd needed?
pstore still needs the "worst case" API to do a preallocation, though.
Anyway, if I could have an example of how to use scomp in pstore, I
could better see where to wire up the proposed zbufsize API...
Thanks!
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-modules/YaMYJv539OEBz5B%2F@google.com/#Z31kernel:module_decompress.c
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-02 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-02 21:51 [PATCH 0/9] crypto: add zbufsize() interface Kees Cook
2018-08-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/9] " Kees Cook
2018-08-07 9:45 ` Herbert Xu
2018-08-07 18:10 ` Kees Cook
2018-08-08 2:53 ` Herbert Xu
2021-12-01 23:39 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-02 1:58 ` Herbert Xu
2021-12-02 3:51 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-12-02 3:57 ` Herbert Xu
2021-12-02 8:10 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-03 2:28 ` Herbert Xu
2021-12-03 20:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-12-07 5:20 ` Herbert Xu
2021-12-07 6:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-12-07 6:27 ` Herbert Xu
2018-08-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/9] crypto, 842: implement zbufsize() Kees Cook
2018-08-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 3/9] crypto, null: Implement zbufsize() Kees Cook
2018-08-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 4/9] crypto, lzo: " Kees Cook
2018-08-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 5/9] crypto, deflate: " Kees Cook
2018-08-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 6/9] crypto, zstd: " Kees Cook
2018-08-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 7/9] crypto, lz4: " Kees Cook
2018-08-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] crypto, lz4hc: " Kees Cook
2018-08-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 9/9] pstore: Use crypto_comp_zbufsize() Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202112011947.7FA0A587C@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=geliangtang@gmail.com \
--cc=haren@us.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox