public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 09/18] rcu/nocb: Limit number of softirq callbacks only on softirq
Date: Wed,  1 Dec 2021 16:29:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211202002912.3127710-9-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211202002848.GA3127439@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

The current condition to limit the number of callbacks executed in a
row checks the offloaded state of the rdp. Not only is it volatile
but it is also misleading: the rcu_core() may well be executing
callbacks concurrently with NOCB kthreads, and the offloaded state
would then be verified on both cases. As a result the limit would
spuriously not apply anymore on softirq while in the middle of
(de-)offloading process.

Fix and clarify the condition with those constraints in mind:

_ If callbacks are processed either by rcuc or NOCB kthread, the call
  to cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() is enough to take care of the overload.

_ If instead callbacks are processed by softirqs:
  * If need_resched(), exit the callbacks processing
  * Otherwise if CPU is idle we can continue
  * Otherwise exit because a softirq shouldn't interrupt a task for too
    long nor deprive other pending softirq vectors of the CPU.

Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 20587d035d03b..4f4d9ea6a9cb5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2525,9 +2525,8 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		/*
 		 * Stop only if limit reached and CPU has something to do.
 		 */
-		if (count >= bl && !offloaded &&
-		    (need_resched() ||
-		     (!is_idle_task(current) && !rcu_is_callbacks_kthread())))
+		if (count >= bl && in_serving_softirq() &&
+		    (need_resched() || !is_idle_task(current)))
 			break;
 		if (unlikely(tlimit)) {
 			/* only call local_clock() every 32 callbacks */
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-02  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-02  0:28 [PATCH rcu 0/18] RCU no-CBs CPU updates for v5.17 Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:28 ` [PATCH rcu 01/18] rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:41   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-02  0:55     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:28 ` [PATCH rcu 02/18] rcu/nocb: Make local rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave() safe against concurrent deoffloading Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:28 ` [PATCH rcu 03/18] rcu/nocb: Prepare state machine for a new step Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:28 ` [PATCH rcu 04/18] rcu/nocb: Invoke rcu_core() at the start of deoffloading Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:28 ` [PATCH rcu 05/18] rcu/nocb: Make rcu_core() callbacks acceleration preempt-safe Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 06/18] rcu/nocb: Make rcu_core() callbacks acceleration (de-)offloading safe Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 07/18] rcu/nocb: Check a stable offloaded state to manipulate qlen_last_fqs_check Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 08/18] rcu/nocb: Use appropriate rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave() Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 10/18] rcu: Fix callbacks processing time limit retaining cond_resched() Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 11/18] rcu: Apply callbacks processing time limit only on softirq Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 12/18] rcu/nocb: Don't invoke local rcu core on callback overload from nocb kthread Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 13/18] rcu/nocb: Remove rcu_node structure from nocb list when de-offloaded Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 14/18] rcu/nocb: Prepare nocb_cb_wait() to start with a non-offloaded rdp Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 15/18] rcu/nocb: Optimize kthreads and rdp initialization Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 16/18] rcu/nocb: Create kthreads on all CPUs if "rcu_nocbs=" or "nohz_full=" are passed Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 17/18] rcu/nocb: Allow empty "rcu_nocbs" kernel parameter Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:29 ` [PATCH rcu 18/18] rcu/nocb: Merge rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread() and rcu_spawn_one_nocb_kthread() Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  2:03 ` [PATCH rcu 0/18] RCU no-CBs CPU updates for v5.17 Yury Norov
2021-12-02 18:01   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211202002912.3127710-9-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox