From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] rcu/nocb: Optimize kthreads and rdp initialization
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 19:10:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211202181039.GD648659@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211125003026.GT641268@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 04:30:26PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:37:05AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Currently cpumask_available() is used to prevent from unwanted
> > NOCB initialization. However if neither "rcu_nocbs=" nor "nohz_full="
> > parameters are passed but CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n, the initialization
> > path is still taken, running through all sorts of needless operations
> > and iterations on an empty cpumask.
> >
> > Fix this with relying on a real initialization state instead. This
> > also optimize kthreads creation, sparing iteration over all online CPUs
> > when nocb isn't initialized.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
> > Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > index e1cb06840454..d8ed3ee47a67 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ static inline bool rcu_current_is_nocb_kthread(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > * Parse the boot-time rcu_nocb_mask CPU list from the kernel parameters.
> > * If the list is invalid, a warning is emitted and all CPUs are offloaded.
> > */
> > +
> > +static bool rcu_nocb_is_setup;
>
> I am taking this as is for now (modulo wordsmithing), but should this
> variable instead be in the rcu_state structure? The advantage of putting
> it there is keeping the state together. The corresponding disadvantage
> is that the state is globally visible within RCU.
>
> Thoughts?
Yes good point, will do!
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-02 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-23 0:37 [PATCH 0/6] rcu/nocb: Last prep work before cpuset interface v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2021-11-23 0:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] rcu/nocb: Remove rdp from nocb list when de-offloaded Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-01 9:25 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2021-12-01 12:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-11-23 0:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] rcu/nocb: Prepare nocb_cb_wait() to start with a non-offloaded rdp Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-01 9:25 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2021-11-23 0:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] rcu/nocb: Optimize kthreads and rdp initialization Frederic Weisbecker
2021-11-25 0:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02 18:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-12-01 9:26 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2021-11-23 0:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] rcu/nocb: Create kthreads on all CPUs if "rcu_nocb=" or "nohz_full=" are passed Frederic Weisbecker
2021-11-23 17:28 ` Juri Lelli
2021-11-25 0:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-01 9:27 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2021-12-02 18:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-11-23 0:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] rcu/nocb: Allow empty "rcu_nocbs" kernel parameter Frederic Weisbecker
2021-11-25 0:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-11-25 0:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-11-25 1:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-11-25 4:41 ` Yury Norov
2021-11-25 11:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-25 13:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-11-25 15:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-01 9:27 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2021-11-23 0:37 ` [PATCH 6/6] rcu/nocb: Merge rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread() and rcu_spawn_one_nocb_kthread() Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-01 9:28 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2021-11-23 17:25 ` [PATCH 0/6] rcu/nocb: Last prep work before cpuset interface v2 Juri Lelli
2021-11-25 1:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-17 15:56 [PATCH 0/6] rcu/nocb: Last prep work before cpuset interface Frederic Weisbecker
2021-11-17 15:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] rcu/nocb: Optimize kthreads and rdp initialization Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211202181039.GD648659@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox