[PATCH 5.4 19/70] net: ethernet: dec: tulip: de4x5: fix possible array overflows in type3_infoblock()

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-06T15:25:45Z

From: Teng Qi <starmiku1207184332@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 0fa68da72c3be09e06dd833258ee89c33374195f ]

The definition of macro MOTO_SROM_BUG is:
#define MOTO_SROM_BUG (lp->active == 8 && (get_unaligned_le32(
dev->dev_addr) & 0x00ffffff) == 0x3e0008)

and the if statement
if (MOTO_SROM_BUG) lp->active = 0;

using this macro indicates lp->active could be 8. If lp->active is 8 and
the second comparison of this macro is false. lp->active will remain 8 in:
lp->phy[lp->active].gep = (*p ? p : NULL); p += (2 * (*p) + 1);
lp->phy[lp->active].rst = (*p ? p : NULL); p += (2 * (*p) + 1);
lp->phy[lp->active].mc = get_unaligned_le16(p); p += 2;
lp->phy[lp->active].ana = get_unaligned_le16(p); p += 2;
lp->phy[lp->active].fdx = get_unaligned_le16(p); p += 2;
lp->phy[lp->active].ttm = get_unaligned_le16(p); p += 2;
lp->phy[lp->active].mci = *p;

However, the length of array lp->phy is 8, so array overflows can occur.
To fix these possible array overflows, we first check lp->active and then
return -EINVAL if it is greater or equal to ARRAY_SIZE(lp->phy) (i.e. 8).

Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Teng Qi <starmiku1207184332@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de4x5.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de4x5.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de4x5.c
index a80252973171f..c97fc0e384ca6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de4x5.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de4x5.c
@@ -4708,6 +4708,10 @@ type3_infoblock(struct net_device *dev, u_char count, u_char *p)
lp->ibn = 3;
lp->active = *p++;
if (MOTO_SROM_BUG) lp->active = 0;
+ /* if (MOTO_SROM_BUG) statement indicates lp->active could
+ * be 8 (i.e. the size of array lp->phy) */
+ if (WARN_ON(lp->active >= ARRAY_SIZE(lp->phy)))
+ return -EINVAL;
lp->phy[lp->active].gep = (*p ? p : NULL); p += (2 * (*p) + 1);
lp->phy[lp->active].rst = (*p ? p : NULL); p += (2 * (*p) + 1);
lp->phy[lp->active].mc = get_unaligned_le16(p); p += 2;
--
2.33.0