[PATCH 5.10 059/130] wireguard: receive: drop handshakes if queue lock is contended

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-06T15:30:31Z

From: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>

commit fb32f4f606c17b869805d7cede8b03d78339b50a upstream.

If we're being delivered packets from multiple CPUs so quickly that the
ring lock is contended for CPU tries, then it's safe to assume that the
queue is near capacity anyway, so just drop the packet rather than
spinning. This helps deal with multicore DoS that can interfere with
data path performance. It _still_ does not completely fix the issue, but
it again chips away at it.

Reported-by: Streun Fabio <fstreun@student.ethz.ch>
Fixes: e7096c131e51 ("net: WireGuard secure network tunnel")
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
@@ -554,9 +554,19 @@ void wg_packet_receive(struct wg_device
case cpu_to_le32(MESSAGE_HANDSHAKE_INITIATION):
case cpu_to_le32(MESSAGE_HANDSHAKE_RESPONSE):
case cpu_to_le32(MESSAGE_HANDSHAKE_COOKIE): {
- int cpu;
- if (unlikely(!rng_is_initialized() ||
- ptr_ring_produce_bh(&wg->handshake_queue.ring, skb))) {
+ int cpu, ret = -EBUSY;
+
+ if (unlikely(!rng_is_initialized()))
+ goto drop;
+ if (atomic_read(&wg->handshake_queue_len) > MAX_QUEUED_INCOMING_HANDSHAKES / 2) {
+ if (spin_trylock_bh(&wg->handshake_queue.ring.producer_lock)) {
+ ret = __ptr_ring_produce(&wg->handshake_queue.ring, skb);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&wg->handshake_queue.ring.producer_lock);
+ }
+ } else
+ ret = ptr_ring_produce_bh(&wg->handshake_queue.ring, skb);
+ if (ret) {
+ drop:
net_dbg_skb_ratelimited("%s: Dropping handshake packet from %pISpfsc\n",
wg->dev->name, skb);
goto err;