From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ftrace: Use direct_ops hash in unregister_ftrace_direct
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 19:20:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211206182032.87248-2-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211206182032.87248-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Now when we have *direct_multi interface the direct_functions
hash is no longer owned just by direct_ops. It's also used by
any other ftrace_ops passed to *direct_multi interface.
Thus to find out that we are unregistering the last function
from direct_ops, we need to check directly direct_ops's hash.
Fixes: f64dd4627ec6 ("ftrace: Add multi direct register/unregister interface")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 30bc880c3849..7f0594e28226 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -5217,6 +5217,7 @@ int unregister_ftrace_direct(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr)
{
struct ftrace_direct_func *direct;
struct ftrace_func_entry *entry;
+ struct ftrace_hash *hash;
int ret = -ENODEV;
mutex_lock(&direct_mutex);
@@ -5225,7 +5226,8 @@ int unregister_ftrace_direct(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr)
if (!entry)
goto out_unlock;
- if (direct_functions->count == 1)
+ hash = direct_ops.func_hash->filter_hash;
+ if (hash->count == 1)
unregister_ftrace_function(&direct_ops);
ret = ftrace_set_filter_ip(&direct_ops, ip, 1, 0);
--
2.33.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-06 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-06 18:20 [PATCHv2 0/3] ftrace: Add ftrace-direct-multi-modify sample module Jiri Olsa
2021-12-06 18:20 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-12-06 18:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] ftrace: Add cleanup to unregister_ftrace_direct_multi Jiri Olsa
2021-12-06 18:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] ftrace/samples: Add module to test multi direct modify interface Jiri Olsa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-05 23:20 [PATCH 0/3] ftrace: Add ftrace-direct-multi-modify sample module Jiri Olsa
2021-12-05 23:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] ftrace: Use direct_ops hash in unregister_ftrace_direct Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211206182032.87248-2-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox