public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] mtd: core: protect access to MTD devices while in suspend
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:53:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211213105336.7be369b7@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213103350.22590c13@xps13>

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:33:50 +0100
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> boris.brezillon@collabora.com wrote on Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:28:01 +0100:
> 
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:10:25 +0100
> > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Hi Sean,
> > > 
> > > sean@geanix.com wrote on Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:25:35 +0100:
> > >     
> > > > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 03:28:11PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:      
> > > > > Hi Sean,
> > > > > 
> > > > > sean@geanix.com wrote on Thu, 9 Dec 2021 15:07:21 +0100:
> > > > >         
> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:39:58PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:        
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >           
> > > > > > > > > Fine by me, lets drop this series.          
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > FYI I've dropped the entire series from mtd/next. I'm waiting for the
> > > > > > > fix discussed below (without abusing the chip mutex ;-) ).          
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Cool, looking forward to test a patch series :)        
> > > > > 
> > > > > Test? You mean "write"? :)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Miquèl        
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Miquel,
> > > > 
> > > > Should we us a atomic for the suspended variable?      
> > > 
> > > I haven't thought about it extensively, an atomic variable sound fine
> > > but I am definitely not a locking expert...    
> > 
> > No need to use an atomic if the variable is already protected by a lock
> > when accessed, and this seems to be case.  
> 
> Maybe there was a confusion about this lock: I think Boris just do not
> want the core to take any lock during a suspend operation. But you can
> still use locks, as long as you release them before suspending.
> 
> And also, that chip lock might not be the one you want to take because
> it's been introduced for another purpose.

Access to the suspended field is already protected by the chip lock,
and I think it's just fine to keep it this way.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-02 11:02 [PATCH v5 0/4] mtd: core: protect access to mtd devices while in suspend Sean Nyekjaer
2021-11-02 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] mtd: rawnand: nand_bbt: hide suspend/resume hooks while scanning bbt Sean Nyekjaer
2021-11-19 18:35   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-11-02 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] mtd: mtdconcat: don't use mtd_{suspend,resume}() Sean Nyekjaer
2021-11-19 18:35   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-11-02 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] mtd: core: protect access to MTD devices while in suspend Sean Nyekjaer
2021-11-19 18:35   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-11-23 12:03   ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-11-23 12:50     ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-11-23 13:07       ` Boris Brezillon
2021-11-29  9:19         ` Miquel Raynal
2021-11-29  9:41           ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-11-29 11:17             ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-11-30 12:41               ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-11-30 13:15                 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-11-30 13:29                   ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-11-30 13:37                     ` Boris Brezillon
2021-12-03 13:39                       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-09 14:07                         ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-12-09 14:28                           ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-10 13:25                             ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-12-13  9:10                               ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-13  9:28                                 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-12-13  9:33                                   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-13  9:53                                     ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2021-12-13 10:50                                       ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-12-13 11:06                                         ` Boris Brezillon
2021-11-02 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] mtd: rawnand: remove suspended check Sean Nyekjaer
2021-11-19 18:35   ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211213105336.7be369b7@collabora.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sean@geanix.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox