From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6857EC433EF for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 07:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237000AbhL3Hus (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:50:48 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:16666 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231688AbhL3Hur (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:50:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1640850647; x=1672386647; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=E4rUNXOvO1jHd34OPqfGBdS40DTrulxFPeCyAJAXELc=; b=nXt6I/dRccyrqlHVMBpa2fASWHQS6olEB5zBM0k0KaI/FeGHHKyEVbOw X7p9icOGvIM3/2YObX9hnL59FhjO7QBL1Wrr80WYe5z6FxMokaGuUwC0o dMozhlzEAu3u+e32JB440vzd/CqDVfxdZdCVhpPIHclk0gRwSOJojOu3D 2Ce73WIUPnnkwYEqhjiJ27pDyZY0fr0ekMr0E/DUTgcM7ftiEbNxM4FWb TXSSwUb5S+JheXpL7KLSRHLjm3KnWITmEcCf6ZphY5aoy4yMjWfu6ODn7 kUgUrW4/FymbihHVu4P9HEOJ9LhC/jXXAWMU5q4O0TbNxYuP2tYrs9qsh Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10212"; a="222305908" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,247,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="222305908" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Dec 2021 23:50:46 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,247,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="486823279" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO e357b3ef1427) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Dec 2021 23:50:45 -0800 Received: from kbuild by e357b3ef1427 with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n2qCy-0009t4-RL; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 07:50:44 +0000 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 15:50:14 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Goldwyn Rodrigues Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH goldwynr] btrfs: btrfs_buffered_read_iomap_ops can be static Message-ID: <20211230075014.GA25567@87202af68ceb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org fs/btrfs/inode.c:8440:24: warning: symbol 'btrfs_buffered_read_iomap_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? Fixes: 3f7d55b62cad ("btrfs: iomap_begin() for buffered read") Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index b50cf3192fa9e..ca8df86d42002 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -8437,7 +8437,7 @@ static int btrfs_read_iomap_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, return 0; } -const struct iomap_ops btrfs_buffered_read_iomap_ops = { +static const struct iomap_ops btrfs_buffered_read_iomap_ops = { .iomap_begin = btrfs_read_iomap_begin, .iomap_end = btrfs_read_iomap_end, };