From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v12 03/10] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 10:52:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220103165212.9303-4-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220103165212.9303-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Rename "struct stackframe" to "struct unwind_state" for consistency and
better naming. Accordingly, rename variable/argument "frame" to "state".
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 66 ++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 3a15d376ab36..fc828c3c5dfd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct stack_info {
* associated with the most recently encountered replacement lr
* value.
*/
-struct stackframe {
+struct unwind_state {
unsigned long fp;
unsigned long pc;
DECLARE_BITMAP(stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index b980d96dccfc..a1a7ff93b84f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -33,13 +33,13 @@
*/
-static void unwind_init(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp,
+static void unwind_init(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long fp,
unsigned long pc)
{
- frame->fp = fp;
- frame->pc = pc;
+ state->fp = fp;
+ state->pc = pc;
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
- frame->kr_cur = NULL;
+ state->kr_cur = NULL;
#endif
/*
@@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ static void unwind_init(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp,
* prev_fp value won't be used, but we set it to 0 such that it is
* definitely not an accessible stack address.
*/
- bitmap_zero(frame->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
- frame->prev_fp = 0;
- frame->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
+ bitmap_zero(state->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
+ state->prev_fp = 0;
+ state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
}
/*
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ static void unwind_init(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp,
* and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
*/
static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct stackframe *frame)
+ struct unwind_state *state)
{
- unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
+ unsigned long fp = state->fp;
struct stack_info info;
/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info))
return -EINVAL;
- if (test_bit(info.type, frame->stacks_done))
+ if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done))
return -EINVAL;
/*
@@ -95,27 +95,27 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
* stack to another, it's never valid to unwind back to that first
* stack.
*/
- if (info.type == frame->prev_type) {
- if (fp <= frame->prev_fp)
+ if (info.type == state->prev_type) {
+ if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
return -EINVAL;
} else {
- set_bit(frame->prev_type, frame->stacks_done);
+ set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
}
/*
* Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
* prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
*/
- frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
- frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
- frame->prev_fp = fp;
- frame->prev_type = info.type;
+ state->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
+ state->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
+ state->prev_fp = fp;
+ state->prev_type = info.type;
- frame->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(frame->pc);
+ state->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(state->pc);
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
if (tsk->ret_stack &&
- (frame->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
+ (state->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
unsigned long orig_pc;
/*
* This is a case where function graph tracer has
@@ -123,16 +123,16 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
* to hook a function return.
* So replace it to an original value.
*/
- orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(tsk, NULL, frame->pc,
- (void *)frame->fp);
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(frame->pc == orig_pc))
+ orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(tsk, NULL, state->pc,
+ (void *)state->fp);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->pc == orig_pc))
return -EINVAL;
- frame->pc = orig_pc;
+ state->pc = orig_pc;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
- if (is_kretprobe_trampoline(frame->pc))
- frame->pc = kretprobe_find_ret_addr(tsk, (void *)frame->fp, &frame->kr_cur);
+ if (is_kretprobe_trampoline(state->pc))
+ state->pc = kretprobe_find_ret_addr(tsk, (void *)state->fp, &state->kr_cur);
#endif
return 0;
@@ -140,15 +140,15 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct stackframe *frame,
+ struct unwind_state *state,
bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data)
{
while (1) {
int ret;
- if (!fn(data, frame->pc))
+ if (!fn(data, state->pc))
break;
- ret = unwind_next(tsk, frame);
+ ret = unwind_next(tsk, state);
if (ret < 0)
break;
}
@@ -192,17 +192,17 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
void *cookie, struct task_struct *task,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct stackframe frame;
+ struct unwind_state state;
if (regs)
- unwind_init(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
+ unwind_init(&state, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
else if (task == current)
- unwind_init(&frame,
+ unwind_init(&state,
(unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1),
(unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0));
else
- unwind_init(&frame, thread_saved_fp(task),
+ unwind_init(&state, thread_saved_fp(task),
thread_saved_pc(task));
- unwind(task, &frame, consume_entry, cookie);
+ unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-03 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <0d0eb36f348fb5a6af6eb592c0525f6e94007328>
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 00/10] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 01/10] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame() madvenka
2022-01-06 16:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 02/10] arm64: Rename unwinder functions madvenka
2022-01-06 16:10 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka [this message]
2022-01-04 14:59 ` [PATCH v12 03/10] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state Mark Brown
2022-01-06 16:11 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 04/10] arm64: Split unwind_init() madvenka
2022-01-06 16:31 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 20:13 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Copy unwind arguments to unwind_state madvenka
2022-01-05 16:57 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-06 16:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 20:17 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 06/10] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 07/10] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2022-01-05 16:58 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-05 23:58 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-06 11:43 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 08/10] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 09/10] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 10/10] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE madvenka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220103165212.9303-4-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
--cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).