From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Mihail Chindris <mihail.chindris@analog.com>,
"open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel@collabora.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:iio:dac make expression evaluation 64-bit
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:39:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220105133902.GD7674@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YcIpAKV7Cmi0o7PU@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:20:32AM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> Two 32-bit values are being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic and then
> passed to s64 type. It is wrong. Expression should be evaluated using
> 64-bit arithmetic and then passed.
>
> Fixes: 8f2b54824b ("drivers:iio:dac: Add AD3552R driver support")
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c
> index 97f13c0b9631..b03d3c7cd4c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c
> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static void ad3552r_calc_gain_and_offset(struct ad3552r_desc *dac, s32 ch)
> dac->ch_data[ch].scale_dec = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST((s64)rem * 1000000,
> 65536);
>
> - dac->ch_data[ch].offset_int = div_s64_rem(v_min * 65536, span, &rem);
> + dac->ch_data[ch].offset_int = div_s64_rem(v_min * 65536L, span, &rem);
"v_min" is relatively close to zero on a number line so this can't
overflow. There is no way that this change affects anything at runtime
(except making the code a tiny tiny bit slower).
And it should be 65536LL for 32 bit systems?
But I just don't see the point of this change. Presumably it is to make
a static analyzer happy?
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-05 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-21 19:20 [PATCH] drivers:iio:dac make expression evaluation 64-bit Muhammad Usama Anjum
2021-12-22 18:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-23 16:34 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2021-12-23 16:38 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2022-01-04 10:28 ` Chindris, Mihail
2022-01-05 13:39 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2022-01-05 15:36 ` Sa, Nuno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220105133902.GD7674@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mihail.chindris@analog.com \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox