linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, realwakka@gmail.com,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: pi433: move get version func to where all other functions are
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 09:59:55 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220108205955.GA3660@mail.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220108111910.GA1978@kadam>

On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 02:19:10PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > are you strongly set on the rf69_read_reg approach or would you
> > be open to keep the original approach? (rf69_get_version)
> 
> I think my approach is best but I don't care.

Thanks for being so flexible. I'll keep your suggestion at the back of my
head and if I come across more scenarios in which rf69_read_reg would
be the easiest way, I will gladly send a different patch to make it
reality.

> > I just want to double-check if this suggestion is taking into
> > consideration what was mentioned here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220106210134.GB3416@mail.google.com/ 
> > 
> > If it is, I'm happy to add it back but I just wanted to confirm it
> > first.
> 
> Yes.  Keep the error handling.  Your way makes the code more complicated
> to read.
>

Agreed. I will add it back.

thanks,

Paulo A.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-08 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-06  9:31 [PATCH] staging: pi433: move get version func to where all other functions are Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-06 10:19 ` Sidong Yang
2022-01-06 20:14   ` Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-06 21:33     ` [PATCH v2] " Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-07  8:53       ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-07 19:24         ` Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-08 11:19           ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-08 16:36             ` Sidong Yang
2022-01-08 21:02               ` Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-08 20:59             ` Paulo Miguel Almeida [this message]
2022-01-08 21:27               ` [PATCH v3] " Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-06 14:04 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2022-01-06 21:01   ` Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-07  8:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-07 18:45   ` Paulo Miguel Almeida

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220108205955.GA3660@mail.google.com \
    --to=paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=realwakka@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).