From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF09C433F5 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 23:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350203AbiARXGE (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 18:06:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34856 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350205AbiARXGB (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 18:06:01 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0685FC06161C for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:06:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id 133so632956pgb.0 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:06:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=Hmwr/NvAL+svS57T9uxuMiXf8YJx8mtgioZKYfbMWac=; b=BaFC4GCONEYspssy1GYPeTrMNDkEWVXKVAKOqw11b2bH5ij+Bh0ZcVZbIsqSHsX3Qr VrvkcDgelRGHD04GNSeQ0EawjnuSS9Sp6OTDcXsq37iiAC2I8naWSF1c+9wsh9n3YcWY 3UUa0zb2PG4/5oVgSbmFHG7VXw9wZJeB6DaGJZ8weyAX2Yc+1eyx2+cRLXOAg1q7/ZXD KL41pPLB6TArHpxRyXvcNKB9PRLiEm2cvYeQvn9tuNFja0Ns0l8vokrywxaaFURf9BFa zO996iFxIxH5Fi5k0TWEzkOL3CE9Pj1dwf1j4lCF/0pFPFt8ppVxSJOGfVXIu+R4ihfH F/1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Hmwr/NvAL+svS57T9uxuMiXf8YJx8mtgioZKYfbMWac=; b=AYvL24sjlFnmSAdeiUeTDHezU6Sf9RdiGIgS37ugGrpwfoT2cBQL27iIlng6jk/oSK FSNQYMOke+6NIl6Tn1ibB77L+nvY0B7F6VVEPnfh6XKWyIpoRPi4zWME8w+2+CmECAu1 LwGztpyzqJ5XPiFsiTpqtiztbI734hxzkQ8yGwGpr0cKCBDC2Qt4h6Aw7G2LzoZRYE8g E5MhpyM7aoJpO7iQ+NtUeP+NxHWidwvGTYNleVzPQPFtNgpxH892bbjPU8bHXpOlKsIq jJLNcbQ51gHfznpsPPGO1MPGQdG3E9MOyoHYilf09lPL3MNIBQGTDvPE/uVWwJwTH3Eq VgRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304a6aSlquz21ZoyZoIBdHT6F/SzP4v8d+YrCX7Yo5UB8ozurHf mrMjMD5rCAhlbmu4ost2o7A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw921ktYTKfD/b2cs4LS0dFFhpk51eulzdZ6obyPw2URyw/MnnVlyi5JrOouALyMeIx+POfCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:b10d:: with SMTP id r13mr25084906pgf.257.1642547160571; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:06:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.google.com (122-58-164-114-fibre.sparkbb.co.nz. [122.58.164.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t8sm15305456pga.15.2022.01.18.15.05.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:06:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:05:55 +1300 From: Paulo Miguel Almeida To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com, realwakka@gmail.com Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] staging: pi433: validate max bit_rate based on modulation used Message-ID: <20220118230555.GA4961@mail.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220118230312.GA4826@mail.google.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Max bit rate is dependent on which modulation is used. Previous validation routine only took into consideration min bit rate which can lead a misconfiguration of the rf69 chip causing the packets not to be sent/read. This patch enhances that input check in set_bit_rate to account for modulation values and their respective max bit rate Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida --- drivers/staging/pi433/TODO | 2 ++ drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c | 10 +++++++++- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/TODO b/drivers/staging/pi433/TODO index 63a40bfcc67e..b9e6c01a02e0 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/TODO +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/TODO @@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ * currently the code introduces new IOCTLs. I'm afraid this is a bad idea. -> Replace this with another interface, hints are welcome! * Some missing data (marked with ###) needs to be added in the documentation +* Change (struct pi433_tx_cfg)->bit_rate to be a u32 so that we can support + bit rates up to 300kbps per the spec. diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c index f4ac17adcd83..d60514a840c2 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c @@ -229,9 +229,17 @@ int rf69_set_bit_rate(struct spi_device *spi, u16 bit_rate) u32 bit_rate_reg; u8 msb; u8 lsb; + enum modulation mod; + + // check if modulation is configured + mod = rf69_get_modulation(spi); + if (mod == UNDEF) { + dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "setBitRate: modulation is undefined"); + return -EINVAL; + } // check input value - if (bit_rate < 1200) { + if (bit_rate < 1200 || (mod == OOK && bit_rate > 32768)) { dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "setBitRate: illegal input param"); return -EINVAL; } -- 2.25.4