From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA0FC433FE for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 08:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1379376AbiAUIan (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2022 03:30:43 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:49682 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349535AbiAUIam (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2022 03:30:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1642753842; x=1674289842; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=mx3znovqbTqSHRCLPhWAXVsdrHy1wURwplgEYl4lCrs=; b=dqf8bvX/mu8LAU+agxPKiHdEI+LJPDgXYJsd9yUQRmleydCLs6T8Xwbx R7b4ORW/gGwBomYUqgPeF03USoYKD3lZrCAGj7CnymePj4Wxlaslbctp0 JSzT16XDtMHlyIx2tR+V+fYFBRqPf9Qx7NYA0ZjNwYMcQHuYgurETLGpk 9H01hPnJbrrDXjkiyxcfggRe3YN5M9Us9FLKSkHsGDxzWIZbj/bBNkzaP +aq5Zard118Vtk0SDASf803UF0WO68obuSxxy+ZvBMIw3GuVOSBqLMLnB iZ6LjFc/DVxLXH1VePpo91tmpjzEDMnss+KjnUEoToNz0glAfLmKmadHD g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10233"; a="244419821" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,304,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="244419821" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jan 2022 00:30:41 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,304,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="518982996" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 276f1b88eecb) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2022 00:30:39 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 276f1b88eecb with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nApJe-000F73-N2; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 08:30:38 +0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:29:52 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: zhenwei pi , mst@redhat.com, arei.gonglei@huawei.com Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, jasowang@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, helei.sig11@bytedance.com, zhenwei pi Subject: [RFC PATCH] virtio-crypto: virtio_crypto_rsa_do_req() can be static Message-ID: <20220121082951.GA46247@b53fa9759326> References: <20220121022438.1042547-4-pizhenwei@bytedance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220121022438.1042547-4-pizhenwei@bytedance.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c:276:5: warning: symbol 'virtio_crypto_rsa_do_req' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c index eebccf71b2fab..2b3f8780b7551 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int __virtio_crypto_akcipher_do_req(struct virtio_crypto_akcipher_request return -ENOMEM; } -int virtio_crypto_rsa_do_req(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *vreq) +static int virtio_crypto_rsa_do_req(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *vreq) { struct akcipher_request *req = container_of(vreq, struct akcipher_request, base); struct virtio_crypto_akcipher_request *vc_akcipher_req = akcipher_request_ctx(req);