Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] fortify: Add Clang support

Kees Cook
2022-02-03T21:26:28Z

On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 12:37:41PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:33 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Enable FORTIFY_SOURCE support for Clang:
> >
> > Use the new __pass_object_size and __overloadable attributes so
> > that Clang will have appropriate visibility into argument sizes such
> > that __builtin_object_size(p, 1) will behave correctly. Additional
> > details here:
> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53516
> > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1401
> >
> > When available, use the new __diagnose_as attribute to make sure no
> > compile-time diagnostic warnings are lost due to the effectively renamed
> > string functions.
>
> Consider adding something along the lines of the following to the
> above paragraph:
> Without diagnose_as, compile time error messages won't be as precise
> as they could be, but at least users of older toolchains will have
> fortified routines. That is more valuable, but certainly a tradeoff.

Sure, I've changed it to:

When available, use the new __diagnose_as attribute to make sure no
compile-time diagnostic warnings are lost due to the effectively renamed
string functions. Without __diagnose_as, Clang's compile time diagnostic
messages won't be as precise as they could be, but at least users of
older toolchains will have fortified routines.

how's that read for you?

> > Redefine strlen() as a macro that tests for being a constant expression
> > so that strlen() can still be used in static initializers, which was
> > lost when adding __pass_object_size and __overloadable.
>
> I'd like to see `const` changes explicit in 4/4; I suspect that's
> _why_ __overloadable is even needed? If so, then a comment here about
> that wouldn't hurt.
>
> Having const be more explicit in the signature will make it more
> obvious why the definition cannot modify the parameter.

Mostly I wanted to minimize further changes to this area when building
with GCC because of all the corner cases that keep popping up, and avoid
tweaking the prototypes any harder. :)

--
Kees Cook