From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B10C433F5 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1358204AbiBDKMz (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 05:12:55 -0500 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:34668 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229626AbiBDKMv (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 05:12:51 -0500 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 36EFC1C0B79; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:12:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:12:49 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Marco Elver , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 08/25] perf: Rework perf_event_exit_event() Message-ID: <20220204101249.GB27857@amd> References: <20220204091914.280602669@linuxfoundation.org> <20220204091914.560626177@linuxfoundation.org> <20220204093734.GA27857@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ftEhullJWpWg/VHq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri 2022-02-04 10:40:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:37:35AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > >=20 > > > From: Peter Zijlstra > > >=20 > > > commit ef54c1a476aef7eef26fe13ea10dc090952c00f8 upstream. > > >=20 > > > Make perf_event_exit_event() more robust, such that we can use it from > > > other contexts. Specifically the up and coming remove_on_exec. > >=20 > > Do we need this in 5.10? AFAICT the remove_on_exec work is not queued > > for 5.10, and this patch is buggy and needs following one to fix it > > up. >=20 > It's needed by the following patch, which says 5.10 is affected. 9/25 says this patch broke 5.10: Fixes: ef54c1a476ae ("perf: Rework perf_event_exit_event()"). 8/25 is not claiming to fix anything. Simply drop 8/25 and 9/25, and 5.10 is okay... Best regards, Pavel --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAmH8/CEACgkQMOfwapXb+vKxAQCgpmftfrOaQRHFHxkOvfPV8ePD cOQAn3PHmS8LM7CgQFVqHdINgaEP0l+M =L6MF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq--