public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 22/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: correctly virtualize LBR msrs when L2 is running
Date: Mon,  7 Feb 2022 17:54:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220207155447.840194-23-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220207155447.840194-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

When L2 is running without LBR virtualization, we should ensure
that L1's LBR msrs continue to update as usual.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 11 +++++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c    | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h    |  2 +
 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index ac9159b0618c7..9f7bc7db08dd3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -535,6 +535,9 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12
 		svm->vcpu.arch.dr6  = svm->nested.save.dr6 | DR6_ACTIVE_LOW;
 		vmcb_mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_DR);
 	}
+
+	if (unlikely(svm->vmcb01.ptr->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))
+		svm_copy_lbrs(svm->vmcb01.ptr, svm->vmcb);
 }
 
 static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
@@ -587,6 +590,9 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj           = svm->nested.ctl.event_inj;
 	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj_err       = svm->nested.ctl.event_inj_err;
 
+	svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext            = svm->vmcb01.ptr->control.virt_ext &
+						 LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK;
+
 	nested_svm_transition_tlb_flush(vcpu);
 
 	/* Enter Guest-Mode */
@@ -852,6 +858,11 @@ int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 	svm_switch_vmcb(svm, &svm->vmcb01);
 
+	if (unlikely(svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK)) {
+		svm_copy_lbrs(svm->nested.vmcb02.ptr, svm->vmcb);
+		svm_update_lbrv(vcpu);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * On vmexit the  GIF is set to false and
 	 * no event can be injected in L1.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index b88ca7f07a0fc..294e016f575a8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -805,6 +805,17 @@ static void init_msrpm_offsets(void)
 	}
 }
 
+void svm_copy_lbrs(struct vmcb *from_vmcb, struct vmcb *to_vmcb)
+{
+	to_vmcb->save.dbgctl		= from_vmcb->save.dbgctl;
+	to_vmcb->save.br_from		= from_vmcb->save.br_from;
+	to_vmcb->save.br_to		= from_vmcb->save.br_to;
+	to_vmcb->save.last_excp_from	= from_vmcb->save.last_excp_from;
+	to_vmcb->save.last_excp_to	= from_vmcb->save.last_excp_to;
+
+	vmcb_mark_dirty(to_vmcb, VMCB_LBR);
+}
+
 static void svm_enable_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
@@ -814,6 +825,10 @@ static void svm_enable_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	set_msr_interception(vcpu, svm->msrpm, MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHTOIP, 1, 1);
 	set_msr_interception(vcpu, svm->msrpm, MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP, 1, 1);
 	set_msr_interception(vcpu, svm->msrpm, MSR_IA32_LASTINTTOIP, 1, 1);
+
+	/* Move the LBR msrs to the vmcb02 so that the guest can see them. */
+	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu))
+		svm_copy_lbrs(svm->vmcb01.ptr, svm->vmcb);
 }
 
 static void svm_disable_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -825,6 +840,63 @@ static void svm_disable_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	set_msr_interception(vcpu, svm->msrpm, MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHTOIP, 0, 0);
 	set_msr_interception(vcpu, svm->msrpm, MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP, 0, 0);
 	set_msr_interception(vcpu, svm->msrpm, MSR_IA32_LASTINTTOIP, 0, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Move the LBR msrs back to the vmcb01 to avoid copying them
+	 * on nested guest entries.
+	 */
+	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu))
+		svm_copy_lbrs(svm->vmcb, svm->vmcb01.ptr);
+}
+
+static int svm_get_lbr_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u32 index)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If the LBR virtualization is disabled, the LBR msrs are always
+	 * kept in the vmcb01 to avoid copying them on nested guest entries.
+	 *
+	 * If nested, and the LBR virtualization is enabled/disabled, the msrs
+	 * are moved between the vmcb01 and vmcb02 as needed.
+	 */
+	struct vmcb *vmcb =
+		(svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK) ?
+			svm->vmcb : svm->vmcb01.ptr;
+
+	switch (index) {
+	case MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR:
+		return vmcb->save.dbgctl;
+	case MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHFROMIP:
+		return vmcb->save.br_from;
+	case MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHTOIP:
+		return vmcb->save.br_to;
+	case MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP:
+		return vmcb->save.last_excp_from;
+	case MSR_IA32_LASTINTTOIP:
+		return vmcb->save.last_excp_to;
+	default:
+		KVM_BUG(false, svm->vcpu.kvm,
+			"%s: Unknown MSR 0x%x", __func__, index);
+		return 0;
+	}
+}
+
+void svm_update_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+
+	bool enable_lbrv = svm_get_lbr_msr(svm, MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR) &
+					   DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR;
+
+	bool current_enable_lbrv = !!(svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext &
+				      LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK);
+
+	if (enable_lbrv == current_enable_lbrv)
+		return;
+
+	if (enable_lbrv)
+		svm_enable_lbrv(vcpu);
+	else
+		svm_disable_lbrv(vcpu);
 }
 
 void disable_nmi_singlestep(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
@@ -2591,25 +2663,12 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 	case MSR_TSC_AUX:
 		msr_info->data = svm->tsc_aux;
 		break;
-	/*
-	 * Nobody will change the following 5 values in the VMCB so we can
-	 * safely return them on rdmsr. They will always be 0 until LBRV is
-	 * implemented.
-	 */
 	case MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR:
-		msr_info->data = svm->vmcb->save.dbgctl;
-		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHFROMIP:
-		msr_info->data = svm->vmcb->save.br_from;
-		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHTOIP:
-		msr_info->data = svm->vmcb->save.br_to;
-		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP:
-		msr_info->data = svm->vmcb->save.last_excp_from;
-		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_LASTINTTOIP:
-		msr_info->data = svm->vmcb->save.last_excp_to;
+		msr_info->data = svm_get_lbr_msr(svm, msr_info->index);
 		break;
 	case MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA:
 		msr_info->data = svm->nested.hsave_msr;
@@ -2840,12 +2899,13 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
 		if (data & DEBUGCTL_RESERVED_BITS)
 			return 1;
 
-		svm->vmcb->save.dbgctl = data;
-		vmcb_mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_LBR);
-		if (data & (1ULL<<0))
-			svm_enable_lbrv(vcpu);
+		if (svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK)
+			svm->vmcb->save.dbgctl = data;
 		else
-			svm_disable_lbrv(vcpu);
+			svm->vmcb01.ptr->save.dbgctl = data;
+
+		svm_update_lbrv(vcpu);
+
 		break;
 	case MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA:
 		/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index c02903641d13d..b83e06d5d942a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -476,6 +476,8 @@ u32 svm_msrpm_offset(u32 msr);
 u32 *svm_vcpu_alloc_msrpm(void);
 void svm_vcpu_init_msrpm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *msrpm);
 void svm_vcpu_free_msrpm(u32 *msrpm);
+void svm_copy_lbrs(struct vmcb *from_vmcb, struct vmcb *to_vmcb);
+void svm_update_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 int svm_set_efer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 efer);
 void svm_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr0);
-- 
2.26.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-07 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-07 15:54 [PATCH RESEND 00/30] My patch queue Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 01/30] KVM: x86: SVM: don't passthrough SMAP/SMEP/PKE bits in !NPT && !gCR0.PG case Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 02/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: fix potential NULL derefernce on nested migration Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 03/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: mark vmcb01 as dirty when restoring SMM saved state Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 04/30] KVM: x86: nSVM/nVMX: set nested_run_pending on VM entry which is a result of RSM Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 05/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: expose clean bit support to the guest Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 06/30] KVM: x86: mark syntethic SMM vmexit as SVM_EXIT_SW Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 07/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control them Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-08 11:33   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-08 11:55     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-08 12:24       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 08/30] KVM: x86: lapic: don't touch irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv when inhibiting it Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 09/30] KVM: x86: SVM: move avic definitions from AMD's spec to svm.h Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 10/30] KVM: x86: SVM: fix race between interrupt delivery and AVIC inhibition Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 11/30] KVM: x86: SVM: use vmcb01 in avic_init_vmcb Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 12/30] KVM: x86: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested guest running Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 13/30] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change APIC ID when apic acceleration is enabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 14/30] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change local apic id when using older x2apic api Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 15/30] KVM: x86: SVM: remove avic's broken code that updated APIC ID Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 16/30] KVM: x86: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 17/30] KVM: x86: mmu: trace kvm_mmu_set_spte after the new SPTE was set Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 18/30] KVM: x86: mmu: add strict mmu mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 19/30] KVM: x86: mmu: add gfn_in_memslot helper Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 20/30] KVM: x86: mmu: allow to enable write tracking externally Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 21/30] x86: KVMGT: use kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enable Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 23/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested LBR virtualization Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 24/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested VMLOAD/VMSAVE Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 25/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: support PAUSE filter threshold and count when cpu_pm=on Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 26/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested vGIF Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 27/30] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 28/30] KVM: SVM: implement force_intercept_exceptions_mask Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 29/30] KVM: VMX: " Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:54 ` [PATCH RESEND 30/30] KVM: x86: get rid of KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-08 12:02 ` [PATCH RESEND 00/30] My patch queue Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-08 12:45   ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220207155447.840194-23-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox