From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] sched: Stop searching for idle cpu if the LLC domain is overloaded
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 14:24:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220208062408.GA621121@chenyu-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220207135253.GF23216@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 11:40:13AM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > It would be ideal to have a crystal ball to predict the success rate
> > of finding an idle cpu/core in the LLC. If it is doomed to fail,
> > there is no need to search in the LLC domain. There are many potential
> > metrics which could be used to predict the success rate. And the
> > metric should be carefully chosen that, it should help reduce the
> > unnecessary cpu runqueue scan, but meanwhile not give up the opportunity
> > to find an idle cpu.
> >
> > Choose average cpu utilization as the candidate, since the util_avg is
> > a metric of accumulated historic activity, which seems to be more accurate
> > than instantaneous metrics(such as rq->nr_running) on calculating the probability
> > of find an idle cpu. Only when the average cpu utilization has reaches
> > 85% of the total cpu capacity, this domain is regarded as overloaded.
> > The reason to choose 85% is that, this is the threshold of an overloaded
> > LLC sched group(imbalance_pct = 117, threshold = 100 / 117 * 100%).
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 5146163bfabb..1a58befe892d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>
> > @@ -6280,6 +6281,10 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
> > if (!this_sd)
> > return -1;
> >
> > + sd_share = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, target));
> > + if (sd_share && READ_ONCE(sd_share->overloaded))
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
> >
> > if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !has_idle_core) {
>
> > @@ -9268,6 +9275,29 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
> > WRITE_ONCE(rd->overutilized, SG_OVERUTILIZED);
> > trace_sched_overutilized_tp(rd, SG_OVERUTILIZED);
> > }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Check if the LLC domain is overloaded. The overload hint
> > + * could be used to skip the LLC domain idle cpu search in
> > + * select_idle_cpu(). The update of this hint occurs during
> > + * periodic load balancing, rather than frequent newidle balance.
> > + */
> > + if (env->idle != CPU_NEWLY_IDLE &&
> > + env->sd->span_weight == per_cpu(sd_llc_size, env->dst_cpu)) {
> > + struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share =
> > + rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, env->dst_cpu));
> > +
> > + if (!sd_share)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Derived from group_is_overloaded(). The default imbalance_pct
> > + * is 117 on LLC domain, which means the threshold of average
> > + * utilization is 85%.
> > + */
> > + WRITE_ONCE(sd_share->overloaded, (sds->total_capacity * 100) <
> > + (sum_util * env->sd->imbalance_pct));
> > + }
> > }
>
> So the only problem I have with this is that this is somewhat of a
> binary toggle. The moment we hit that magical 85% we suddenly change
> behaviour.
>
> Would it not be possible to replace the SIS_PROP logic with something
> based on this sum_util metric? Such that when sum_util is very low we
> scan more, while when sum_util hits 85% we naturally stop scanning
> entirely.
>
> That way the behaviour is gradual.
Ok, let me do some evaluation on this, maybe something like nr_to_scan = f(sum_util)
thanks,
Chenyu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-07 3:40 [PATCH][RFC] sched: Stop searching for idle cpu if the LLC domain is overloaded Chen Yu
2022-02-07 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-08 6:24 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2022-02-10 7:57 ` [sched] e9accc2386: stress-ng.dccp.ops_per_sec 46.9% improvement kernel test robot
2022-02-23 10:05 ` [PATCH][RFC] sched: Stop searching for idle cpu if the LLC domain is overloaded K Prateek Nayak
2022-02-27 3:02 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220208062408.GA621121@chenyu-desktop \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox