public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, kim.phillips@amd.com, acme@redhat.com,
	jolsa@redhat.com, songliubraving@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 01/12] perf/core: add perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() helper
Date: Tue,  8 Feb 2022 13:16:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220208211637.2221872-2-eranian@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208211637.2221872-1-eranian@google.com>

Make it simpler to reset all the info fields on the
perf_branch_entry by adding a helper inline function.

The goal is to centralize the initialization to avoid missing
a field in case more are added.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
 include/linux/perf_event.h  | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 669c2be14784..6a903113d3a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -769,6 +769,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable_all(void)
 void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 {
 	unsigned long mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
+	struct perf_branch_entry *br = cpuc->lbr_entries;
 	u64 tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
 	int i;
 
@@ -784,15 +785,11 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 
 		rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + lbr_idx, msr_lastbranch.lbr);
 
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from	= msr_lastbranch.from;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].to		= msr_lastbranch.to;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].mispred	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].predicted	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].in_tx	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].abort	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].cycles	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].type	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].reserved	= 0;
+		perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br);
+
+		br->from	= msr_lastbranch.from;
+		br->to		= msr_lastbranch.to;
+		br++;
 	}
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.hw_idx = tos;
@@ -807,6 +804,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 {
 	bool need_info = false, call_stack = false;
 	unsigned long mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
+	struct perf_branch_entry *br = cpuc->lbr_entries;
 	u64 tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
 	int i;
 	int out = 0;
@@ -878,15 +876,14 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 		if (abort && x86_pmu.lbr_double_abort && out > 0)
 			out--;
 
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].from	 = from;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].to	 = to;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].mispred	 = mis;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].predicted = pred;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].in_tx	 = in_tx;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].abort	 = abort;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].cycles	 = cycles;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].type	 = 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].reserved	 = 0;
+		perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br+out);
+		br[out].from	 = from;
+		br[out].to	 = to;
+		br[out].mispred	 = mis;
+		br[out].predicted = pred;
+		br[out].in_tx	 = in_tx;
+		br[out].abort	 = abort;
+		br[out].cycles	 = cycles;
 		out++;
 	}
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = out;
@@ -951,6 +948,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_store_lbr(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
 		to = rdlbr_to(i, lbr);
 		info = rdlbr_info(i, lbr);
 
+		perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(e);
+
 		e->from		= from;
 		e->to		= to;
 		e->mispred	= get_lbr_mispred(info);
@@ -959,7 +958,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_store_lbr(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
 		e->abort	= !!(info & LBR_INFO_ABORT);
 		e->cycles	= get_lbr_cycles(info);
 		e->type		= get_lbr_br_type(info);
-		e->reserved	= 0;
 	}
 
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 733649184b27..496eb6aa6e54 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1063,6 +1063,22 @@ static inline void perf_sample_data_init(struct perf_sample_data *data,
 	data->txn = 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Clear all bitfields in the perf_branch_entry.
+ * The to and from fields are not cleared because they are
+ * systematically modified by caller.
+ */
+static inline void perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(struct perf_branch_entry *br)
+{
+	br->mispred = 0;
+	br->predicted = 0;
+	br->in_tx = 0;
+	br->abort = 0;
+	br->cycles = 0;
+	br->type = 0;
+	br->reserved = 0;
+}
+
 extern void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 			       struct perf_event_header *header,
 			       struct perf_sample_data *data,
-- 
2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 21:16 [PATCH v6 00/12] perf/x86/amd: Add AMD Fam19h Branch Sampling support Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] x86/cpufeatures: add AMD Fam19h Branch Sampling feature Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] perf/x86/amd: add AMD Fam19h Branch Sampling support Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] perf/x86/amd: add branch-brs helper event for Fam19h BRS Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] perf/x86/amd: enable branch sampling priv level filtering Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] perf/x86/amd: add AMD branch sampling period adjustment Stephane Eranian
2022-02-09 15:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-04 15:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-09 23:03       ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-15 12:08         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-17 17:11           ` Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] perf/x86/amd: make Zen3 branch sampling opt-in Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] ACPI: add perf low power callback Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] perf/x86/amd: add idle hooks for branch sampling Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] perf tools: Improve IBS error handling Stephane Eranian
2022-02-09 15:47   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-15  6:49     ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-15  2:01   ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-15  6:23     ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-15  7:12       ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-15  7:45   ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-16  0:03     ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-16 11:07       ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-16 11:16         ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] perf tools: Improve error handling of AMD Branch Sampling Stephane Eranian
2022-02-16 14:17   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] perf report: add addr_from/addr_to sort dimensions Stephane Eranian
2022-02-16 14:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220208211637.2221872-2-eranian@google.com \
    --to=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox