From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, kim.phillips@amd.com, acme@redhat.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, songliubraving@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 01/12] perf/core: add perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() helper
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 13:16:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220208211637.2221872-2-eranian@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208211637.2221872-1-eranian@google.com>
Make it simpler to reset all the info fields on the
perf_branch_entry by adding a helper inline function.
The goal is to centralize the initialization to avoid missing
a field in case more are added.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
include/linux/perf_event.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 669c2be14784..6a903113d3a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -769,6 +769,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable_all(void)
void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
{
unsigned long mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
+ struct perf_branch_entry *br = cpuc->lbr_entries;
u64 tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
int i;
@@ -784,15 +785,11 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + lbr_idx, msr_lastbranch.lbr);
- cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from = msr_lastbranch.from;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[i].to = msr_lastbranch.to;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[i].mispred = 0;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[i].predicted = 0;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[i].in_tx = 0;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[i].abort = 0;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[i].cycles = 0;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[i].type = 0;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[i].reserved = 0;
+ perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br);
+
+ br->from = msr_lastbranch.from;
+ br->to = msr_lastbranch.to;
+ br++;
}
cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
cpuc->lbr_stack.hw_idx = tos;
@@ -807,6 +804,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
{
bool need_info = false, call_stack = false;
unsigned long mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
+ struct perf_branch_entry *br = cpuc->lbr_entries;
u64 tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
int i;
int out = 0;
@@ -878,15 +876,14 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
if (abort && x86_pmu.lbr_double_abort && out > 0)
out--;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[out].from = from;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[out].to = to;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[out].mispred = mis;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[out].predicted = pred;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[out].in_tx = in_tx;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[out].abort = abort;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[out].cycles = cycles;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[out].type = 0;
- cpuc->lbr_entries[out].reserved = 0;
+ perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br+out);
+ br[out].from = from;
+ br[out].to = to;
+ br[out].mispred = mis;
+ br[out].predicted = pred;
+ br[out].in_tx = in_tx;
+ br[out].abort = abort;
+ br[out].cycles = cycles;
out++;
}
cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = out;
@@ -951,6 +948,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_store_lbr(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
to = rdlbr_to(i, lbr);
info = rdlbr_info(i, lbr);
+ perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(e);
+
e->from = from;
e->to = to;
e->mispred = get_lbr_mispred(info);
@@ -959,7 +958,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_store_lbr(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
e->abort = !!(info & LBR_INFO_ABORT);
e->cycles = get_lbr_cycles(info);
e->type = get_lbr_br_type(info);
- e->reserved = 0;
}
cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 733649184b27..496eb6aa6e54 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1063,6 +1063,22 @@ static inline void perf_sample_data_init(struct perf_sample_data *data,
data->txn = 0;
}
+/*
+ * Clear all bitfields in the perf_branch_entry.
+ * The to and from fields are not cleared because they are
+ * systematically modified by caller.
+ */
+static inline void perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(struct perf_branch_entry *br)
+{
+ br->mispred = 0;
+ br->predicted = 0;
+ br->in_tx = 0;
+ br->abort = 0;
+ br->cycles = 0;
+ br->type = 0;
+ br->reserved = 0;
+}
+
extern void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
struct perf_event_header *header,
struct perf_sample_data *data,
--
2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-08 21:16 [PATCH v6 00/12] perf/x86/amd: Add AMD Fam19h Branch Sampling support Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] x86/cpufeatures: add AMD Fam19h Branch Sampling feature Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] perf/x86/amd: add AMD Fam19h Branch Sampling support Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] perf/x86/amd: add branch-brs helper event for Fam19h BRS Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] perf/x86/amd: enable branch sampling priv level filtering Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] perf/x86/amd: add AMD branch sampling period adjustment Stephane Eranian
2022-02-09 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-04 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-09 23:03 ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-15 12:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-17 17:11 ` Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] perf/x86/amd: make Zen3 branch sampling opt-in Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] ACPI: add perf low power callback Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] perf/x86/amd: add idle hooks for branch sampling Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] perf tools: Improve IBS error handling Stephane Eranian
2022-02-09 15:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-15 6:49 ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-15 2:01 ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-15 6:23 ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-15 7:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-15 7:45 ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-16 0:03 ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-16 11:07 ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-16 11:16 ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] perf tools: Improve error handling of AMD Branch Sampling Stephane Eranian
2022-02-16 14:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] perf report: add addr_from/addr_to sort dimensions Stephane Eranian
2022-02-16 14:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220208211637.2221872-2-eranian@google.com \
--to=eranian@google.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox