public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: aubrey.li@linux.intel.com, efault@gmx.de, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	mingo@kernel.org, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com,
	srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Consider cpu affinity when allowing NUMA imbalance in find_idlest_group
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:46:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220209104625.GM23216@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220207155921.21321-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>

On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 09:29:21PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Neither the sched/tip nor Mel's v5 patchset [1] provides an optimal
> new-task wakeup strategy when the tasks are affined to a subset of cpus
> which can result in piling of tasks on the same set of CPU in a NUMA
> group despite there being other cpus in a different NUMA group where the
> task could have run in. 

Where does this affinity come from?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-09 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-07 15:59 [PATCH] sched/fair: Consider cpu affinity when allowing NUMA imbalance in find_idlest_group K Prateek Nayak
2022-02-08 10:51 ` Mel Gorman
2022-02-08 11:14   ` K Prateek Nayak
2022-02-09 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-02-09 11:17   ` K Prateek Nayak
     [not found]   ` <MW2PR12MB237955DEA3F949359A96E031982E9@MW2PR12MB2379.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
2022-02-09 17:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-11  7:36       ` K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220209104625.GM23216@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox