From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 3/9] rcu: Add mutex for rcu boost kthread spawning and affinity setting
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:57:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220211145757.GA587320@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220204230805.4193767-3-paulmck@kernel.org>
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:07:59PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
>
> As we handle parallel CPU bringup, we will need to take care to avoid
> spawning multiple boost threads, or race conditions when setting their
> affinity. Spotted by Paul McKenney.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Speaking of, we have:
rcu_init()
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) // should be boot CPU only at this stage ?
rcutree_prepare_cpu(cpu)
rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(cpu)
early_initcall()
rcu_spawn_gp_kthread()
rcu_spawn_boost_kthreads()
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp)
rcu_rnp_online_cpus(rnp) // as above, only boot CPU at this stage.
rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(cpu)
cpu_up()
rcutree_prepare_cpu(cpu)
rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(cpu)
My guess is that we could remove rcu_spawn_boost_kthreads() and simplify
rcu_init(). Something like this (untested yet):
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 86eec6a0f1a1..da8ac2b6f8cc 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4526,7 +4526,6 @@ static int __init rcu_spawn_gp_kthread(void)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
wake_up_process(t);
rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads();
- rcu_spawn_boost_kthreads();
rcu_spawn_core_kthreads();
return 0;
}
@@ -4813,7 +4812,7 @@ static void __init kfree_rcu_batch_init(void)
void __init rcu_init(void)
{
- int cpu;
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
rcu_early_boot_tests();
@@ -4833,11 +4832,10 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
* or the scheduler are operational.
*/
pm_notifier(rcu_pm_notify, 0);
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- rcutree_prepare_cpu(cpu);
- rcu_cpu_starting(cpu);
- rcutree_online_cpu(cpu);
- }
+
+ rcutree_prepare_cpu(cpu);
+ rcu_cpu_starting(cpu);
+ rcutree_online_cpu(cpu);
/* Create workqueue for Tree SRCU and for expedited GPs. */
rcu_gp_wq = alloc_workqueue("rcu_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 6082dd23408f..90925a589774 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1226,18 +1226,6 @@ static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
free_cpumask_var(cm);
}
-/*
- * Spawn boost kthreads -- called as soon as the scheduler is running.
- */
-static void __init rcu_spawn_boost_kthreads(void)
-{
- struct rcu_node *rnp;
-
- rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp)
- if (rcu_rnp_online_cpus(rnp))
- rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rnp);
-}
-
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
@@ -1263,10 +1251,6 @@ static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
{
}
-static void __init rcu_spawn_boost_kthreads(void)
-{
-}
-
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-11 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-04 23:07 [PATCH rcu 0/9] Miscellaneous fixes for v5.18 Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-04 23:07 ` [PATCH rcu 1/9] MAINTAINERS: Add Frederic and Neeraj to their RCU files Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-11 15:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-11 16:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-04 23:07 ` [PATCH rcu 2/9] rcu: Fix description of kvfree_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-04 23:07 ` [PATCH rcu 3/9] rcu: Add mutex for rcu boost kthread spawning and affinity setting Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-11 14:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-02-11 15:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-11 15:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-11 15:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-04 23:08 ` [PATCH rcu 4/9] rcu: Inline __call_rcu() into call_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-04 23:08 ` [PATCH rcu 5/9] kasan: Record work creation stack trace with interrupts enabled Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-04 23:08 ` [PATCH rcu 6/9] rcu: Mark writes to the rcu_segcblist structure's ->flags field Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-04 23:08 ` [PATCH rcu 7/9] rcu: Uninline multi-use function: finish_rcuwait() Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-04 23:08 ` [PATCH rcu 8/9] rcu: Remove __read_mostly annotations from rcu_scheduler_active externs Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-04 23:08 ` [PATCH rcu 9/9] rcu: Replace cpumask_weight with cpumask_empty where appropriate Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-11 15:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220211145757.GA587320@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox