From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/nohz: disallow non-existent cores from nohz-full
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:20:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220221182009.1283-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> (raw)
This is a rebase and retest of two fixes I'd sent earlier[1].
The rebase is required due to conflicts in my patch #1 and where Frederic updated
the unwind code in housekeeping_setup in his series[2] and that series is now
in sched/core of tip[3].
So this update is against a baseline of ed3b362d54f0 found in sched/core as
"sched/isolation: Split housekeeping cpumask per isolation features" in tip.
Changes amount to "return 0" ---> "goto out_free" and adding a nod to PaulM's
observation that nohz_full w/o a cpuset is coming someday into the commit log.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211206145950.10927-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220207155910.527133-1-frederic@kernel.org/
[3] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
----- Original v1 text follows -----
A couple months back I sent a fix to reconcile rcu_nocbs= input
restrictions with nohz_full= input restrictions; with the latter being
more restrictive than the former.
However, in relaxing the nohz_full restrictions, I made it possible to
boot with a nohz_full= parameter that contains nothing but nonexistent
and not-possible cores - which will trigger a WARN.
This fixes the original reconcile commit by explicitly coding our
allowed values just like RCU does, and changes the WARN_ON to a
WARN_ON_ONCE, since it needlessly rendered the machine unusable.
---
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Paul Gortmaker (2):
sched/isolation: really align nohz_full with rcu_nocbs
tick/nohz: WARN_ON --> WARN_ON_ONCE to prevent console saturation
kernel/sched/isolation.c | 11 +++++++++++
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-21 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 18:20 Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2022-02-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/isolation: really align nohz_full with rcu_nocbs Paul Gortmaker
2022-02-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] tick/nohz: WARN_ON --> WARN_ON_ONCE to prevent console saturation Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220221182009.1283-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox