From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B6CC433F5 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 22:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237304AbiBYWTH (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 17:19:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35280 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229927AbiBYWTD (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 17:19:03 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8773FCFBAC for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:18:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1645827509; x=1677363509; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=z0t6umZFSsFQi800PuhFPF3XXD6xv7GQd81Q9Rk0qK0=; b=dwR6gkttQfDjMkkpLxqHjtdbXgAiavrJO8LlDGgMqvvflHgbF2Fuztua RgNLu2xfNDD5qnAjtlESr8Cb2YGJ/veh4nXVG39BV44RnelnXTe5AbAEv efb3LsKfHZ0qfyQzVXzG/njjdSeyTRSasUS26hF60sp/xnpvs1DORh5/9 XOdXyTNSvrVe/L4LhmI1fydvtvTQKsL+uI5D/2FCaoMNMdxCUFiulSm/F ami5dXun701/k6cIi+rBFE4xd93oQdSV8wUgtAmDzJ3pH9JhlcvTBtHCh PuliLNp6BsANgmLCdHDgdkD2RmSf7GeDyWM66NkvfCNzqhHzhEq5e3F0J Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10269"; a="252786632" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,137,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="252786632" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Feb 2022 14:18:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,137,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="492107723" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 788b1cd46f0d) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2022 14:18:26 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 788b1cd46f0d with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nNiuv-0004mD-NC; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 22:18:25 +0000 Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 06:18:04 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Michael Cheng , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, willy@infradead.org, michael.cheng@intel.com, casey.g.bowman@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com, wayne.boyer@intel.com, tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com, matthew.d.roper@intel.com, geert@linux-m68k.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Add struct folio to cacheflush.h Message-ID: <202202260658.uzJ0YnVP-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220225201248.984169-1-michael.cheng@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220225201248.984169-1-michael.cheng@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Michael, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on linux/master] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.17-rc5 next-20220224] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michael-Cheng/Add-struct-folio-to-cacheflush-h/20220226-041442 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 2c271fe77d52a0555161926c232cd5bc07178b39 config: um-i386_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220226/202202260658.uzJ0YnVP-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/f519440dbde207a6ade2472cd2e6c32028923342 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Michael-Cheng/Add-struct-folio-to-cacheflush-h/20220226-041442 git checkout f519440dbde207a6ade2472cd2e6c32028923342 # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> ld: block/bfq-wf2q.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `folio'; block/bfq-iosched.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here ld: block/bfq-cgroup.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `folio'; block/bfq-iosched.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here -- >> ld: fs/isofs/inode.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `folio'; fs/isofs/namei.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here ld: fs/isofs/dir.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `folio'; fs/isofs/namei.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here ld: fs/isofs/util.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `folio'; fs/isofs/namei.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here ld: fs/isofs/rock.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `folio'; fs/isofs/namei.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here ld: fs/isofs/export.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `folio'; fs/isofs/namei.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here ld: fs/isofs/joliet.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `folio'; fs/isofs/namei.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org