From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DACC433EF for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 01:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232244AbiB1BRK (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2022 20:17:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45140 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232149AbiB1BRH (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2022 20:17:07 -0500 Received: from mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789BA5C36B for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 17:16:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com with SMTP id 189-20020a4a03c6000000b003179d7b30d8so16582051ooi.2 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 17:16:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7/ANazmQRWPjWBpokxfHRpyBE2xUY/hh0dQYknwczs0=; b=hHP+bkaxMofR+din6Bhv27LdxA2CIjZCDaZ5b/7WLAvw3Jizi+yr63RM5H+waPdxNK PJhoZ21T9lM9S4K8SSu7GqoeKHAnW2zCyBnzj+oj2P9AzhyLU+889hfMIdXVNnX+xxf5 T5pcfFOPS2AT6d/I5iSwvoUQT+7haiZse6HUBBXqCrOfqbXGbolefUsa0MOFU1/RMNaj 16TUe85p31szJEd39XTmChGQ1rCHQtc78RGkPrZAE7ZXVvo6QpNRRSBSCwQUMpSGE5HW GoY+vyV2O+3VErcl30nttLZBs8NF0IjGcl0sJDybnE0LVhvy6hNzFtOJW4oSnA/s1Z7S /yEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7/ANazmQRWPjWBpokxfHRpyBE2xUY/hh0dQYknwczs0=; b=OZoL8m/4y3HswfrmrbVbFPIdPyHyHcgsj/oBDX4VNAhoGdraHkk+ZQ1JL5+yYA3Nzf W9cwOCntPF0gwx1Nh1+ZIPZQylOQ0rCk49BtW4ZCZyTBOwT+O9U/UsgXhlq4LCwxfEy+ 7ODM5yHgi8VB+p/OaOxxR4KwgpPaPcRMauYq4gOkzEqhcdVtTxwJYQi00oC7TLL7l6tP uZ8TGk8laQNSHF/r++TBC+t9WQ9x0hdUHaZYqSCB07pz4KG9WniGRWuay84RXnho6/4w Sf/cEDR2GltzzDthUHKEpCG4dpkXyrUy/e3S1YTgNAC/hWLxbaZYLtB4ZPY3gLpoEoLt cXEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jLWtIFbVaK98Z+yxHmw8AWiKLBeRqfm1YcHfR0K1tPcXRp7dn mD4Q8HPRdM/wggaTMJL0xPAha/B5WLs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwppnxPNjsGSZK8pl5PmE2h1mOm2/Qfj21OgeH8v7grXwNnxowjU9U/fBJO/GnMdUz+Muc+cA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:7815:b0:d7:2d72:28dd with SMTP id hb21-20020a056870781500b000d72d7228ddmr762708oab.61.1646010988760; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 17:16:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h3-20020a4aa9c3000000b003181c02e7ccsm4123573oon.47.2022.02.27.17.16.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 27 Feb 2022 17:16:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 17:16:26 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 5.17-rc6 Message-ID: <20220228011626.GA169657@roeck-us.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 03:00:26PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Nobody can claim that last week was *normal*, but whatever crazy > things are going on in the world (and I personally had "Zombie > apocalypse" on my bingo card, not "Putin has a mental breakdown"), it > doesn't seem to have affected the kernel much. > > Things continue to look normal both in commit numbers and in > diffstats. We have the usual bulk being drivers (networking, gpu, iio, > clk, and usb stand out, but there's a smattering of other stuff), with > the rest being mixed. The only thing that stands out as a bit unusual > is some further btrfs defrag fixes. But even they stand out not so > much because they are enormous, as just because they are bigger than > most of the rest, which is pretty small. > > Other notable areas: core networking, tracing, and selftests. As > usual, details are in the appended shortlog. > > While things look reasonably normal, we _are_ getting pretty late in > the release, and we still have a number of known regressions. They > don't seem all that big and scary, but some of them were reported > right after the rc1 release, so they are getting a bit long in the > tooth. I'd hate to have to delay 5.17 just because of them, and I'm > starting to be a bit worried here. I think all the affected > maintainers know who they are... > > So if you are a subsystem maintainer, and you have one of those > regressions on your list, please go make them a priority. And if you > don't know what I'm talking about, please do look up the reports by > regzbot and Guenter Roeck. I added links below to make it really easy. > > But on the whole things look fine. Just a few remaining warts is all. > But the more testing to verify, the better. > > Linus > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/164598944963.346832.10219407090470852309@leemhuis.info/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220221024743.GA4097766@roeck-us.net/ > Build results: total: 155 pass: 153 fail: 2 Failed builds: powerpc:skiroot_defconfig sparc64:allmodconfig Qemu test results: total: 488 pass: 487 fail: 1 Failed tests: arm:orangepi-pc:multi_v7_defconfig:usb1:net,nic:sun8i-h3-orangepi-pc:rootfs --- Building powerpc:skiroot_defconfig ... failed -------------- arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c: In function 'handle_backtrace_ipi': arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c:171:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'nmi_cpu_backtrace' Introduced with commit 1614b2b11fab29 ("arch: Make ARCH_STACKWALK independent of STACKTRACE"). Discussed at https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YeE2VWwHO50gFw9M@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/T/ Fixed with commit 5a72345e6a78 ("powerpc: Fix STACKTRACE=n build") in linux-next. --- Building arm:orangepi-pc:multi_v7_defconfig:usb1:net,nic:sun8i-h3-orangepi-pc:rootfs ... running ........R.... failed (no root file system) Introduced with 8df89a7cbc63 ("pinctrl-sunxi: don't call pinctrl_gpio_direction()"). Fix posted at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/0f536cd8-01db-5d16-2cec-ec6d19409a49@xs4all.nl/ and in linux-next as commit 3c5412cdec9f ("pinctrl-sunxi: sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset"). The fix exposes a lockdep splat for which a fix is posted at https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220216040037.22730-1-samuel@sholland.org/ --- Building sparc64:allmodconfig ... failed -------------- Error log: :1517:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp] sparc64-linux-ld: drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.o: in function `gpmc_probe_generic_child': omap-gpmc.c:(.text.unlikely+0x14c4): undefined reference to `of_platform_device_create' Introduced by commit 4cd335dae3cf ("mtd: rawnand: omap2: Prevent invalid configuration and build error"). Reported: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220219150836.GA1035394@roeck-us.net/T/#t Fix: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/patch/20220219193600.24892-1-rogerq@kernel.org/ Guenter