From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Alison Schofield" <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
<nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] cxl/core: Introduce cxl_set_lock_class()
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 18:33:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220309183323.00000048@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <164610295699.2682974.3646198829625502263.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:49:17 -0800
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> Update CONFIG_PROVE_CXL_LOCKING to use the common device-core helpers
> for device_lock validation.
>
> When CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled and device_set_lock_class() is
> passed a non-zero lock class the core acquires the 'struct device'
> @lockdep_mutex everywhere it acquires the device_lock. Where
> lockdep_mutex does not skip lockdep validation like device_lock.
>
> cxl_set_lock_class() wraps device_set_lock_class() as to not collide
> with other subsystems that may also support this lockdep validation
> scheme. See the 'choice' for the various CONFIG_PROVE_$SUBSYS_LOCKING
> options in lib/Kconfig.debug.
>
> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
One query inline - otherwise looks good to me.
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index b1a4ba622739..f0a821de94cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ int cxl_add_region(struct cxl_decoder *cxld, struct cxl_region *cxlr)
> if (rc)
> goto err;
>
> + cxl_set_lock_class(dev);
I didn't see a cxl_lock_class for regions. Or is this meant to use
the ANON_LOCK?
> rc = device_add(dev);
> if (rc)
> goto err;
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 1357a245037d..f94eff659cce 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -543,5 +543,14 @@ static inline int cxl_lock_class(struct device *dev)
> else
> return CXL_ANON_LOCK;
> }
> +
> +static inline void cxl_set_lock_class(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + device_set_lock_class(dev, cxl_lock_class(dev));
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void cxl_set_lock_class(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +}
> #endif
> #endif /* __CXL_H__ */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-09 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-01 2:48 [PATCH 00/11] device-core: Generic device-lock lockdep validation Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:48 ` [PATCH 01/11] device-core: Enable " Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:49 ` [PATCH 02/11] cxl/core: Refactor a cxl_lock_class() out of cxl_nested_lock() Dan Williams
2022-03-09 18:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-09 18:34 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:49 ` [PATCH 03/11] cxl/core: Remove cxl_device_lock() Dan Williams
2022-03-09 18:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-10 3:54 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:49 ` [PATCH 04/11] cxl/core: Clamp max lock_class Dan Williams
2022-03-09 18:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-09 19:59 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:49 ` [PATCH 05/11] cxl/core: Introduce cxl_set_lock_class() Dan Williams
2022-03-09 18:33 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-03-10 4:08 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:49 ` [PATCH 06/11] cxl/acpi: Add a lock class for the root platform device Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:49 ` [PATCH 07/11] libnvdimm: Refactor an nvdimm_lock_class() helper Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:49 ` [PATCH 08/11] ACPI: NFIT: Drop nfit_device_lock() Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:49 ` [PATCH 09/11] libnvdimm: Drop nd_device_lock() Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:49 ` [PATCH 10/11] libnvdimm: Enable lockdep validation Dan Williams
2022-03-01 2:49 ` [PATCH 11/11] device-core: Introduce a per-subsystem lockdep_mutex Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220309183323.00000048@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox