From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Subject: [for-linus][PATCH 2/3] tracing/osnoise: Force quiescent states while tracing
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:04:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220310150449.656065937@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20220310150431.248810778@goodmis.org
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
At the moment running osnoise on a nohz_full CPU or uncontested FIFO
priority and a PREEMPT_RCU kernel might have the side effect of
extending grace periods too much. This will entice RCU to force a
context switch on the wayward CPU to end the grace period, all while
introducing unwarranted noise into the tracer. This behaviour is
unavoidable as overly extending grace periods might exhaust the system's
memory.
This same exact problem is what extended quiescent states (EQS) were
created for, conversely, rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() emulates them by
performing a zero duration EQS. So let's make use of it.
In the common case rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() is fairly inexpensive:
atomically incrementing a local per-CPU counter and doing a store. So it
shouldn't affect osnoise's measurements (which has a 1us granularity),
so we'll call it unanimously.
The uncommon case involve calling rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() after
having the osnoise process:
- Receive an expedited quiescent state IPI with preemption disabled or
during an RCU critical section. (activates rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp
code-path).
- Being preempted within in an RCU critical section and having the
subsequent outermost rcu_read_unlock() called with interrupts
disabled. (t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked code-path).
Neither of those are possible at the moment, and are unlikely to be in
the future given the osnoise's loop design. On top of this, the noise
generated by the situations described above is unavoidable, and if not
exposed by rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() will be eventually seen in
subsequent rcu_read_unlock() calls or schedule operations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220307180740.577607-1-nsaenzju@redhat.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: bce29ac9ce0b ("trace: Add osnoise tracer")
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
index 2aa3efdca755..5e3c62a08fc0 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
@@ -1386,6 +1386,26 @@ static int run_osnoise(void)
osnoise_stop_tracing();
}
+ /*
+ * In some cases, notably when running on a nohz_full CPU with
+ * a stopped tick PREEMPT_RCU has no way to account for QSs.
+ * This will eventually cause unwarranted noise as PREEMPT_RCU
+ * will force preemption as the means of ending the current
+ * grace period. We avoid this problem by calling
+ * rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(), which performs a zero duration
+ * EQS allowing PREEMPT_RCU to end the current grace period.
+ * This call shouldn't be wrapped inside an RCU critical
+ * section.
+ *
+ * Note that in non PREEMPT_RCU kernels QSs are handled through
+ * cond_resched()
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU)) {
+ local_irq_disable();
+ rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle();
+ local_irq_enable();
+ }
+
/*
* For the non-preemptive kernel config: let threads runs, if
* they so wish.
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 15:04 [for-linus][PATCH 0/3] tracing: Three fixes Steven Rostedt
2022-03-10 15:04 ` [for-linus][PATCH 1/3] tracing/osnoise: Do not unregister events twice Steven Rostedt
2022-03-10 15:04 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2022-03-10 15:04 ` [for-linus][PATCH 3/3] ftrace: Fix some W=1 warnings in kernel doc comments Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220310150449.656065937@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox