From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Bang Li <libang.linuxer@gmail.com>
Cc: naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Allow both @symbol_name and @addr to exist
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 17:36:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220313173646.e3d797f9ee3105239179fb5d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220313032125.124094-1-libang.linuxer@gmail.com>
On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 11:21:25 +0800
Bang Li <libang.linuxer@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the address found by the @symbol_name is equal to the @addr, this case
> should be considered a valid parameter combinations.
Could you tell me the reason why this is needed and use case?
I explictly made this case as an error, because I couldn't find
any good reason to support this case.
Thank you,
>
> Example:
>
> static struct kprobe kp = {
> .symbol_name = "kernel_clone",
> .addr = (kprobe_opcode_t*)kernel_clone,
> };
>
> Signed-off-by: Bang Li <libang.linuxer@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 94cab8c9ce56..70d4ed9e7dc7 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1497,13 +1497,19 @@ bool within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
> static kprobe_opcode_t *_kprobe_addr(kprobe_opcode_t *addr,
> const char *symbol_name, unsigned int offset)
> {
> - if ((symbol_name && addr) || (!symbol_name && !addr))
> + kprobe_opcode_t *symbol_addr;
> +
> + if (!symbol_name && !addr)
> goto invalid;
>
> if (symbol_name) {
> - addr = kprobe_lookup_name(symbol_name, offset);
> - if (!addr)
> + symbol_addr = kprobe_lookup_name(symbol_name, offset);
> + if (!symbol_addr)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +
> + if (addr && symbol_addr != addr)
> + goto invalid;
> + addr = symbol_addr;
> }
>
> addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)(((char *)addr) + offset);
> @@ -2062,8 +2068,7 @@ bool __weak arch_kprobe_on_func_entry(unsigned long offset)
> * function entry address or not.
> * This returns 0 if it is the function entry, or -EINVAL if it is not.
> * And also it returns -ENOENT if it fails the symbol or address lookup.
> - * Caller must pass @addr or @sym (either one must be NULL), or this
> - * returns -EINVAL.
> + * Caller must pass @addr or @sym, or this returns -EINVAL.
> */
> int kprobe_on_func_entry(kprobe_opcode_t *addr, const char *sym, unsigned long offset)
> {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-13 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-13 3:21 [PATCH] kprobes: Allow both @symbol_name and @addr to exist Bang Li
2022-03-13 8:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2022-03-15 13:56 ` 李棒
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220313173646.e3d797f9ee3105239179fb5d@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=libang.linuxer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox