From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 14:37:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220314133738.269522-3-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220314133738.269522-1-frederic@kernel.org>
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
CONFIG_PREEMPT{_NONE, _VOLUNTARY} designate either:
o The build-time preemption model when !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
o The default boot-time preemption model when PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
IOW, using those on PREEMPT_DYNAMIC kernels is meaningless - the actual
model could have been set to something else by the "preempt=foo" cmdline
parameter.
Introduce a set of helpers to determine the actual preemption mode used by
the live kernel.
Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 508b91d57470..d348e886e4d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2096,6 +2096,22 @@ static inline void cond_resched_rcu(void)
#endif
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
+
+extern bool preempt_mode_none(void);
+extern bool preempt_mode_voluntary(void);
+extern bool preempt_mode_full(void);
+
+#else
+
+#define preempt_mode_none() IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE)
+#define preempt_mode_voluntary() IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY)
+#define preempt_mode_full() IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
+
+#endif
+
+#define preempt_mode_rt() IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
+
/*
* Does a critical section need to be broken due to another
* task waiting?: (technically does not depend on CONFIG_PREEMPTION,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 2e4ae00e52d1..6e5c8f0f874a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6684,6 +6684,17 @@ static void __init preempt_dynamic_init(void)
}
}
+#define PREEMPT_MODE_ACCESSOR(mode) \
+ bool preempt_mode_##mode(void) \
+ { \
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_dynamic_mode == preempt_dynamic_undefined); \
+ return preempt_dynamic_mode == preempt_dynamic_##mode; \
+ }
+
+PREEMPT_MODE_ACCESSOR(none)
+PREEMPT_MODE_ACCESSOR(voluntary)
+PREEMPT_MODE_ACCESSOR(full)
+
#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
static inline void preempt_dynamic_init(void) { }
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-14 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-14 13:37 [PATCH 0/3] rcu: synchronize_rcu[_expedited]() related fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-14 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] rcu: Fix expedited GP polling against UP/no-preempt environment Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-14 13:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-03-14 14:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors Marco Elver
2022-03-14 20:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-14 20:34 ` Marco Elver
2022-03-14 21:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-14 22:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-15 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-15 15:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-14 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] rcu: Fix preemption mode check on synchronize_rcu[_expedited]() Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-14 20:26 ` [PATCH 0/3] rcu: synchronize_rcu[_expedited]() related fixes Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-14 22:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-15 15:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-15 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220314133738.269522-3-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=uladzislau.rezki@sony.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox