From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
acme@kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/10] perf: Extend branch type classification
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:22:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220315112232.GF8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220315053516.431515-4-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:05:09AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> branch_entry.type now has ran out of space to accommodate more branch types
> classification. This will prevent perf branch stack implementation on arm64
> (via BRBE) to capture all available branch types. Extending this bit field
> i.e branch_entry.type [4 bits] is not an option as it will break user space
> ABI both for little and big endian perf tools.
>
> Extend branch classification with a new field branch_entry.new_type via a
> new branch type PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI in branch_entry.type. Perf tools which
> could decode PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI, will then parse branch_entry.new_type as
> well.
>
> branch_entry.new_type is a 4 bit field which can hold upto 16 branch types.
> The first three branch types will hold various generic page faults followed
> by five architecture specific branch types, which can be overridden by the
> platform for specific use cases. These architecture specific branch types
> gets overridden on arm64 platform for BRBE implementation.
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index 26d8f0b5ac0d..d29280adc3c4 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -255,9 +255,22 @@ enum {
> PERF_BR_IRQ = 12, /* irq */
> PERF_BR_SERROR = 13, /* system error */
> PERF_BR_NO_TX = 14, /* not in transaction */
> + PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI = 15, /* extend ABI */
> PERF_BR_MAX,
> };
> #define PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL \
> (PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER|\
> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL|\
> @@ -1372,7 +1385,8 @@ struct perf_branch_entry {
> abort:1, /* transaction abort */
> cycles:16, /* cycle count to last branch */
> type:4, /* branch type */
> - reserved:40;
> + new_type:4, /* additional branch type */
> + reserved:36;
> };
Hurmpf... this will effectively give us 5 bits of space for the cost of
8, that seems... unfortunate.
Would something like:
type:4,
ext_type:4,
reserved:36;
and have all software do:
type = pbe->type | (pbe->ext_type << 4);
Then old software will only know about the old types. New software on
old kernels will add 4 0's, which is harmless, while new software on new
kernels will get 8 bytes of type.
Would that work?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-15 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 5:35 [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: Expand perf_branch_entry Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 5:35 ` [PATCH V4 01/10] perf: Add irq and exception return branch types Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 5:35 ` [PATCH V4 02/10] perf: Add system error and not in transaction " Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 5:35 ` [PATCH V4 03/10] perf: Extend branch type classification Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 11:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-03-15 13:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-16 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-17 5:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 5:35 ` [PATCH V4 04/10] perf: Capture branch privilege information Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-16 17:26 ` James Clark
2022-03-15 5:35 ` [PATCH V4 05/10] perf: Add PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_[N] map for BRBE on arm64 platform Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 5:35 ` [PATCH V4 06/10] perf/tools: Add irq and exception return branch types Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 5:35 ` [PATCH V4 07/10] perf/tools: Add system error and not in transaction " Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 5:35 ` [PATCH V4 08/10] perf/tools: Extend branch type classification Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 5:35 ` [PATCH V4 09/10] perf/tools: Add branch privilege information request flag Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 5:35 ` [PATCH V4 10/10] perf/tools: Add PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_[N] map for BRBE on arm64 platform Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220315112232.GF8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox