From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rcu: synchronize_rcu[_expedited]() related fixes
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:52:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220315155226.GC274290@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220314223504.GA1150279@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:35:04PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:26:10PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:37:35PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > >
> > > A few fixes especially for expedited GP polling causing a stall on TREE07,
> > > as reported by Paul.
> > >
> > > We may still want to optimize start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() on
> > > UP-no-preempt but I think Paul may be implying this while doing other
> > > fixes.
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> > > rcu/dev
> > >
> > > HEAD: 6e5fd7e614fd5c8f0fffeaa140b7ea697bfeb096
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Frederic
> >
> > I have pulled these in for review and testing, thank you!!! I have
> > started a ~90-minute test and will let you know how that goes.
>
> And TREE05 doesn't like this much. I get too-short grace periods.
> TREE05 is unusual in being the one with the kernel build with
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y but also with CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=n.
>
> Running tests of the commits individually.
Ouch, please test the following:
---
From f180dd5809d2c3a6343cbd13f244b7b7f110a506 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:33:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] rcutorture: Call preempt_schedule() through static call/key
rcutorture sometimes want to trigger a random scheduler preemption call
while simulating a read delay. However a direct call to
preempt_schedule() is not desirable because it bypasses the static
call/key filter used by CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC. This breaks the
no-preempt assumption in case the dynamic preemption mode is "none".
For example rcu_blocking_is_gp() is fooled and abbreviates grace periods
when the CPU runs in no-preempt UP mode.
Fix this with making torture_preempt_schedule() to call through
preempt dynamic static call/key.
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/torture.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/torture.h b/include/linux/torture.h
index 63fa4196e51c..7038104463e4 100644
--- a/include/linux/torture.h
+++ b/include/linux/torture.h
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void _torture_stop_kthread(char *m, struct task_struct **tp);
_torture_stop_kthread("Stopping " #n " task", &(tp))
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
-#define torture_preempt_schedule() preempt_schedule()
+#define torture_preempt_schedule() __preempt_schedule()
#else
#define torture_preempt_schedule() do { } while (0)
#endif
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-15 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-14 13:37 [PATCH 0/3] rcu: synchronize_rcu[_expedited]() related fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-14 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] rcu: Fix expedited GP polling against UP/no-preempt environment Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-14 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-14 14:44 ` Marco Elver
2022-03-14 20:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-14 20:34 ` Marco Elver
2022-03-14 21:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-14 22:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-15 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-15 15:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-14 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] rcu: Fix preemption mode check on synchronize_rcu[_expedited]() Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-14 20:26 ` [PATCH 0/3] rcu: synchronize_rcu[_expedited]() related fixes Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-14 22:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-15 15:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-03-15 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220315155226.GC274290@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=uladzislau.rezki@sony.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox