public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] rcu: Perform early sequence fetch for polling locklessly
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 15:42:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220316144255.336021-4-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220316144255.336021-1-frederic@kernel.org>

The workqueue ordering guarantees that the work sees all the accesses
of the task prior to its call to the corresponding queue_work().

Therefore the sequence to poll can be retrieved locklessly.

The only downside is that it is then possible to miss the 0x1 flag set
by a prior work. But this could already happen concurrently anyway after
the exp_poll_lock is unlocked. In the worst case the slow path involving
synchronize_rcu_expedited() takes care of the situation.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 763ec35546ed..c4a19c6a83cf 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -909,9 +909,7 @@ static void sync_rcu_do_polled_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = container_of(wp, struct rcu_node, exp_poll_wq);
 	unsigned long s;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
-	s = rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq;
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
+	s = READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq);
 	if (s & 0x1)
 		return;
 	while (!sync_exp_work_done(s))
@@ -919,7 +917,7 @@ static void sync_rcu_do_polled_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
 	s = rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq;
 	if (!(s & 0x1) && sync_exp_work_done(s))
-		rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq |= 0x1;
+		WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq, s | 0x1);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -949,7 +947,7 @@ unsigned long start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 	if (rcu_init_invoked())
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
 	if ((rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq & 0x1) || ULONG_CMP_LT(rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq, s)) {
-		rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq = s;
+		WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq, s);
 		if (rcu_init_invoked())
 			queue_work(rcu_gp_wq, &rnp->exp_poll_wq);
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-16 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-16 14:42 [RFC PATCH 0/4] rcu: Expedited GP polling improvements Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-16 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] rcu: Remove needless polling work requeue for further waiter Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-16 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] rcu: No need to reset the poll request flag before completion Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-30 11:27   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-30 17:57     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-16 14:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-03-16 14:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] rcu: Name internal polling flag Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-17  9:42   ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-03-17 15:33     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-22  2:11   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-22 10:32     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-24  1:04       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-24  1:19         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220316144255.336021-4-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=uladzislau.rezki@sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox