public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
	Alec Brown <alec.r.brown@oracle.com>,
	Kanth Ghatraju <kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com>,
	Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@oracle.com>,
	"dpsmith@apertussolutions.com" <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>,
	"piotr.krol@3mdeb.com" <piotr.krol@3mdeb.com>,
	"krystian.hebel@3mdeb.com" <krystian.hebel@3mdeb.com>,
	"persaur@gmail.com" <persaur@gmail.com>,
	"Yoder, Stuart" <stuart.yoder@arm.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com" <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	"lukasz@hawrylko.pl" <lukasz@hawrylko.pl>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: Linux DRTM on UEFI platforms
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:18:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220330071859.GA992@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXE9WrBOUG6MRQ90cMH_NvvCw_jVCar5Dsj+gkZr1AA0MQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 09:12:19AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 09:11, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> > The EFI stub carries out a bunch of actions that have meaningful
> > security impact, and that's material that should be measured. Having the
> > secure launch kernel execute the stub without awareness of what it does
> > means it would need to measure the code without measuring the state,
> > while the goal of DRTM solutions is to measure state rather than the
> > code.
> 
> But how is that any different from the early kernel code?

From a conceptual perspective we've thought of the EFI stub as being 
logically part of the bootloader rather than the early kernel, and the 
bootloader is a point where the line is drawn. My guy feeling is that 
jumping into the secure kernel environment before EBS has been called is 
likely to end badly.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 17:40 Linux DRTM on UEFI platforms Matthew Garrett
2022-03-30  7:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-30  7:11   ` Matthew Garrett
2022-03-30  7:12     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-30  7:18       ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2022-03-30  7:23         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-30  7:27           ` Matthew Garrett
2022-03-30  7:39             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-30 12:46               ` James Bottomley
2022-03-31  0:35   ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-03-31  7:13     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-31 10:59       ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-05-19 20:57       ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-05-19 20:57 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-06-10 16:40   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-05 18:35     ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-06  0:03       ` Brendan Trotter
2022-07-06  0:12         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-07-07  9:46         ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-08  3:36           ` Brendan Trotter
2022-07-08  4:56             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-07-22 17:23             ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-07-23  5:15               ` Brendan Trotter
2022-08-09 10:53                 ` Daniel P. Smith
2022-08-10  9:07                   ` Brendan Trotter
2022-08-10 17:46                     ` Matthew Garrett
2022-08-11  9:55                       ` Brendan Trotter
2022-08-11 11:34                         ` Daniel Kiper
2022-08-11 18:25                         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-08-12  3:22                           ` Brendan Trotter
2022-08-12  5:54                             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-08-05 12:53       ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220330071859.GA992@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=alec.r.brown@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
    --cc=dpsmith@apertussolutions.com \
    --cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=krystian.hebel@3mdeb.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz@hawrylko.pl \
    --cc=michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com \
    --cc=persaur@gmail.com \
    --cc=piotr.krol@3mdeb.com \
    --cc=ross.philipson@oracle.com \
    --cc=stuart.yoder@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox