public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch/arm64: Fix topology initialization for core scheduling
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:53:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220331145343.GF17613@pauld.bos.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e93a7d66-7e43-d2c7-ad85-fb24d50effc5@arm.com>

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 04:37:50PM +0200 Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 31/03/2022 15:21, Phil Auld wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:04:31AM +0200 Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >> On 30/03/2022 17:56, Phil Auld wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> Ah, the reason is that smt_mask is not correctly setup, so we bail on
> >> `cpumask_weight(smt_mask) == 1` for !leaders in:
> >>
> >> notify_cpu_starting()
> >>   cpuhp_invoke_callback_range()
> >>     sched_cpu_starting()
> >>       sched_core_cpu_starting()
> >>
> >> which leads to rq->core not being correctly set for !leader-rq's.
> >>
> > 
> > Exactly, sorry I was not clearer.  smt_mask must be setup correctly 
> > by the time sched_core_cpu_starting() is called. (Maybe I should crib
> > some of the above lines into the commit message?)
> 
> Yeah, maybe, it wouldn't hurt I guess. IMHO mentioning stress-ng's prctl
> needs PR_SCHED_CORE support could also be handy since today's stress-ng
> packages don't seem to have this yet.
> 

My scripts clone it so I did not realize that was not in prepackaged versions
yet.  But that said, that's really just a way to tickle the problem. Anyone
using core scheduling on such a system will hit this (at least the WARN part,
the actual crash was harder to create w/o all the threads and tasks stress-ng
uses). 

I can send a v3 with a further commit message update.


Cheers,
Phil

-- 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-31 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-30 15:56 [PATCH v2] arch/arm64: Fix topology initialization for core scheduling Phil Auld
2022-03-31  9:04 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-31 13:21   ` Phil Auld
2022-03-31 14:37     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-31 14:53       ` Phil Auld [this message]
2022-03-31 15:49         ` Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220331145343.GF17613@pauld.bos.csb \
    --to=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox