public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
	John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] KVM: SEV: Mark nested locking of vcpu->mutex
Date: Tue,  5 Apr 2022 10:46:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220405174637.2074319-1-pgonda@google.com> (raw)

svm_vm_migrate_from() uses sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration() to lock all
source and target vcpu->mutex. Mark the nested subclasses to avoid false
positives from lockdep.

Warning example:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.17.0-dbg-DEV #15 Tainted: G           O
--------------------------------------------
sev_migrate_tes/18859 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8d672d484238 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration+0x7e/0x150
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8d67703f81f8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration+0x7e/0x150
other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&vcpu->mutex);
  lock(&vcpu->mutex);
 *** DEADLOCK ***
 May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by sev_migrate_tes/18859:
 #0: ffff9302f91323b8 (&kvm->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sev_vm_move_enc_context_from+0x96/0x740
 #1: ffff9302f906a3b8 (&kvm->lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sev_vm_move_enc_context_from+0xae/0x740
 #2: ffff8d67703f81f8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration+0x7e/0x150

Fixes: b56639318bb2b ("KVM: SEV: Add support for SEV intra host migration")
Reported-by: John Sperbeck<jsperbeck@google.com>
Suggested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>

---

Tested by running sev_migrate_tests with lockdep enabled. Before we see
a warning from sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration(). After we get no warnings.

---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 75fa6dd268f0..673e1ee2cfc9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -1591,14 +1591,21 @@ static void sev_unlock_two_vms(struct kvm *dst_kvm, struct kvm *src_kvm)
 	atomic_set_release(&src_sev->migration_in_progress, 0);
 }
 
+#define SEV_MIGRATION_SOURCE 0
+#define SEV_MIGRATION_TARGET 1
 
-static int sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration(struct kvm *kvm)
+/*
+ * To avoid lockdep warnings callers should pass @vm argument with either
+ * SEV_MIGRATION_SOURCE or SEV_MIGRATE_TARGET. This allows subclassing of all
+ * vCPU mutex locks.
+ */
+static int sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration(struct kvm *kvm, int vm)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	unsigned long i, j;
 
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
-		if (mutex_lock_killable(&vcpu->mutex))
+		if (mutex_lock_killable_nested(&vcpu->mutex, i * 2 + vm))
 			goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
@@ -1745,10 +1752,10 @@ int sev_vm_move_enc_context_from(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int source_fd)
 		charged = true;
 	}
 
-	ret = sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration(kvm);
+	ret = sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration(kvm, SEV_MIGRATION_SOURCE);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_dst_cgroup;
-	ret = sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration(source_kvm);
+	ret = sev_lock_vcpus_for_migration(source_kvm, SEV_MIGRATION_TARGET);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_dst_vcpu;
 
-- 
2.35.1.1094.g7c7d902a7c-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-05 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-05 17:46 Peter Gonda [this message]
2022-04-06 18:05 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: SEV: Mark nested locking of vcpu->mutex Sean Christopherson
2022-04-07 19:59   ` Peter Gonda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220405174637.2074319-1-pgonda@google.com \
    --to=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=jsperbeck@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox