Re: [PATCH 05/34] drm/i915/gvt: cleanup the Makefile

Wang, Zhi A
2022-04-13T13:39:48Z

On 4/13/22 12:33 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 07:11:03PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>> Up to you but I usually sort these lists
>>>
>>> Yeah, please do. Otherwise matches what I sent, so ack.
>>
>> Let's just merge your 2 patch series ASAP and I'll rebase on top of
>> that.
>
> I rebased them on top of current gvt-next and resent [1]. Zhenyu, Zhi,
> please pick them up if you approve.
>
>> What branch in drm-intel should I use as the base for the next version
>> btw? Or does gvt go through yet another tree?
>
> It's yet another tree... Basically gvt is developed on top of gvt-next
> (see MAINTAINERS) and Zhenyu and Zhi send pull requests for
> drm-intel-next.
>
Hi Jani and Christoph:

It seems Jani's makefile clean patch has already included this one, I can
just simply drop this one so that Christoph won't need to re-send everything.

For the branch to move on, I am merging the patches and will re-generate the
gvt-staging branch, which combines the newest drm-tip vfio-upstream and other
gvt branches.

If you are in a rush of re-basing the patches of non-GVT-g stuff, you can use
gvt-staging branch until my pull request landed in drm-intel-next.

Also our QA will test gvt-staging-branch before the pull request. I suppose
it will take one or two days.

Again, thanks so much for making this happen.

Thanks,
Zhi.
> > BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1649852517.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
>