From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: robin.murphy@arm.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, hch@lst.de,
Wang Zhaoyang1 <zhaoyang1.wang@intel.com>,
Gao Liang <liang.gao@intel.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-direct: avoid redundant memory sync for swiotlb
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 21:21:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220412132132.GA18002@gao-cwp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220412113805.3210-1-chao.gao@intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 07:38:05PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>When we looked into FIO performance with swiotlb enabled in VM, we found
>swiotlb_bounce() is always called one more time than expected for each DMA
>read request.
>
>It turns out that the bounce buffer is copied to original DMA buffer twice
>after the completion of a DMA request (one is done by in
>dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu(), the other by swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single()).
>But the content in bounce buffer actually doesn't change between the two
>rounds of copy. So, one round of copy is redundant.
>
>Pass DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC flag to swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() to
>skip the memory copy in it.
>
>This fix increases FIO 64KB sequential read throughput in a guest with
>swiotlb=force by 5.6%.
>
Sorry. A fixes tag is missing:
Fixes: 55897af63091 ("dma-direct: merge swiotlb_dma_ops into the dma_direct code")
>Reported-by: Wang Zhaoyang1 <zhaoyang1.wang@intel.com>
>Reported-by: Gao Liang <liang.gao@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
>Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
>---
> kernel/dma/direct.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.h b/kernel/dma/direct.h
>index 4632b0f4f72e..8a6cd53dbe8c 100644
>--- a/kernel/dma/direct.h
>+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.h
>@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static inline void dma_direct_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
> dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, addr, size, dir);
>
> if (unlikely(is_swiotlb_buffer(dev, phys)))
>- swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
>+ swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys, size, dir,
>+ attrs | DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> }
> #endif /* _KERNEL_DMA_DIRECT_H */
>--
>2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-12 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-12 11:38 [PATCH] dma-direct: avoid redundant memory sync for swiotlb Chao Gao
2022-04-12 13:21 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2022-04-12 13:33 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-13 1:02 ` Chao Gao
2022-04-13 4:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-13 5:46 ` Chao Gao
2022-04-13 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-13 13:10 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-13 16:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220412132132.GA18002@gao-cwp \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=liang.gao@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=zhaoyang1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox