From: Donghai Qiao <dqiao@redhat.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, arnd@arndb.de,
peterz@infradead.org, heying24@huawei.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
rdunlap@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, gor@linux.ibm.com
Cc: donghai.w.qiao@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Donghai Qiao <dqiao@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] smp: eliminate SCF_WAIT and SCF_RUN_LOCAL
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 22:46:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220415024701.876364-4-dqiao@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220415024701.876364-1-dqiao@redhat.com>
The commit a32a4d8a815c ("smp: Run functions concurrently in
smp_call_function_many_cond()") was to improve the concurrent
of the cross call execution between local and remote. The change
in smp_call_function_many_cond() did what was intended, but the
new macro SCF_WAIT and SCF_RUN_LOCAL and the code around them
to handle local call were not unnecessary because the modified
function smp_call_function_many() was able to handle the local
cross call. So these two macros can be eliminated and the code
implemented around that can be removed as well.
Also this patch fixed a issue of a comparison between an integer
and a unsigned integer in smp_call_function_many_cond().
The changes with this patch and the changes made in subsequent
patches will eventually help eliminate the set of on_each_cpu*
functions.
Signed-off-by: Donghai Qiao <dqiao@redhat.com>
---
kernel/smp.c | 32 +++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 6183a3586329..3f9bc5ae7180 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -787,23 +787,13 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
-/*
- * Flags to be used as scf_flags argument of smp_call_function_many_cond().
- *
- * %SCF_WAIT: Wait until function execution is completed
- * %SCF_RUN_LOCAL: Run also locally if local cpu is set in cpumask
- */
-#define SCF_WAIT (1U << 0)
-#define SCF_RUN_LOCAL (1U << 1)
-
static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
- unsigned int scf_flags,
+ bool wait,
smp_cond_func_t cond_func)
{
int cpu, last_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct call_function_data *cfd;
- bool wait = scf_flags & SCF_WAIT;
bool run_remote = false;
bool run_local = false;
int nr_cpus = 0;
@@ -829,14 +819,14 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task());
/* Check if we need local execution. */
- if ((scf_flags & SCF_RUN_LOCAL) && cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
run_local = true;
/* Check if we need remote execution, i.e., any CPU excluding this one. */
cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
if (cpu == this_cpu)
cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
- if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+ if ((unsigned int)cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
run_remote = true;
if (run_remote) {
@@ -911,12 +901,8 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
* @mask: The set of cpus to run on (only runs on online subset).
* @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
* @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function.
- * @wait: Bitmask that controls the operation. If %SCF_WAIT is set, wait
- * (atomically) until function has completed on other CPUs. If
- * %SCF_RUN_LOCAL is set, the function will also be run locally
- * if the local CPU is set in the @cpumask.
- *
- * If @wait is true, then returns once @func has returned.
+ * @wait: If wait is true, the call will not return until func()
+ * has completed on other CPUs.
*
* You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or from a
* hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler. Preemption
@@ -925,7 +911,7 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait)
{
- smp_call_function_many_cond(mask, func, info, wait * SCF_WAIT, NULL);
+ smp_call_function_many_cond(mask, func, info, wait, NULL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_many);
@@ -1061,13 +1047,9 @@ void __init smp_init(void)
void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(smp_cond_func_t cond_func, smp_call_func_t func,
void *info, bool wait, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
- unsigned int scf_flags = SCF_RUN_LOCAL;
-
- if (wait)
- scf_flags |= SCF_WAIT;
preempt_disable();
- smp_call_function_many_cond(mask, func, info, scf_flags, cond_func);
+ smp_call_function_many_cond(mask, func, info, wait, cond_func);
preempt_enable();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond_mask);
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-15 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-15 2:46 [PATCH 00/11] smp: cross CPU call interface Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 2:46 ` [PATCH 01/11] smp: consolidate the structure definitions to smp.h Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 2:46 ` [PATCH 02/11] smp: cross call interface Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 2:46 ` Donghai Qiao [this message]
2022-04-15 2:46 ` [PATCH 04/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single() with smp_xcall() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 2:46 ` [PATCH 05/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single_async() with smp_xcall_private() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 2:46 ` [PATCH 06/11] smp: use smp_xcall_private() fron irq_work.c and core.c Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 2:46 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: change smp_call_function_any() to smp_xcall_any() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 2:46 ` [PATCH 08/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_many_cond() with __smp_call_mask_cond() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 2:46 ` [PATCH 09/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single_async with smp_xcall_private Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 2:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single() with smp_xcall() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 2:47 ` [PATCH 11/11] smp: modify up.c to adopt the same format of cross CPU call Donghai Qiao
2022-04-15 12:13 ` [PATCH 00/11] smp: cross CPU call interface Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220415024701.876364-4-dqiao@redhat.com \
--to=dqiao@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=donghai.w.qiao@gmail.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heying24@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).