public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: joao@overdrivepizza.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, samitolvanen@google.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com,
	alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com, ndesaulniers@google.com,
	gabriel.gomes@linux.intel.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/11] linux/interrupt: Fix prototype matching property
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:45:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202204191942.3C273AB@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420004241.2093-11-joao@overdrivepizza.com>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 05:42:40PM -0700, joao@overdrivepizza.com wrote:
> Unions will make function pointers with different prototypes be used through
> the same call. This leads into the same call instruction being used for
> calling functions with different prototypes, making them unsuitable for
> prototype-based fine-grained CFI.

Why? Shouldn't the callers be using different prototypes?

> Fix this CFI policy violation by removing the function pointer union in
> the tasklet struct.

The good news is that tasklet is on the way out the door[1], so this may
quickly become a non-issue, but also to that end, this fix is hardly a
problem for a deprecated API...

-Kees

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/20220419211658.11403-1-apais@linux.microsoft.com/

> 
> Signed-off-by: Joao Moreira <joao@overdrivepizza.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/interrupt.h | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> index f40754caaefa..8d5504b0f20b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -650,10 +650,8 @@ struct tasklet_struct
>  	unsigned long state;
>  	atomic_t count;
>  	bool use_callback;
> -	union {
> -		void (*func)(unsigned long data);
> -		void (*callback)(struct tasklet_struct *t);
> -	};
> +	void (*func)(unsigned long data);
> +	void (*callback)(struct tasklet_struct *t);
>  	unsigned long data;
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-20  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20  0:42 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Kernel FineIBT Support joao
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] x86: kernel FineIBT joao
2022-04-29  1:37   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-05-02 17:17     ` Joao Moreira
2022-05-03 22:02       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-05-04  2:19         ` Joao Moreira
2022-05-04 10:20         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-04 17:04           ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-05-04 18:16             ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-05  0:28               ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-05-05  7:36                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-08  8:29               ` Kees Cook
2022-05-09 11:22                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] kbuild: Support FineIBT build joao
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] objtool: Support FineIBT offset fixes joao
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] x86/module: Support FineIBT in modules joao
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] x86/text-patching: Support FineIBT text-patching joao
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] x86/bpf: Support FineIBT joao
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] x86/lib: Prevent UACCESS call warning from objtool joao
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] x86/ibt: Add CET_TEST module for IBT testing joao
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] x86/FineIBT: Add FINEIBT_TEST module joao
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] linux/interrupt: Fix prototype matching property joao
2022-04-20  2:45   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-04-20 22:14     ` Joao Moreira
2022-04-20  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] driver/int3400_thermal: Fix prototype matching joao
2022-04-20  2:55   ` Kees Cook
2022-04-20 22:28     ` Joao Moreira
2022-04-20 23:04       ` Kees Cook
2022-04-20 23:12         ` Joao Moreira
2022-04-20 23:25           ` Kees Cook
2022-04-21  0:28             ` Joao Moreira
2022-04-20  2:42 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Kernel FineIBT Support Kees Cook
2022-04-20 22:50   ` Joao Moreira
2022-04-20  7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-20 15:17   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-20 17:12     ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-04-20 22:40       ` Joao Moreira
2022-04-21  7:49         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-21 15:23           ` Joao Moreira
2022-04-21 15:35             ` H.J. Lu
2022-04-21 22:11               ` Fangrui Song
2022-04-21 22:26                 ` H.J. Lu
2022-04-20 23:34 ` Edgecombe, Rick P

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202204191942.3C273AB@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=gabriel.gomes@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=joao@overdrivepizza.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox