public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v3 14/15] printk: extend console_lock for proper kthread support
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:04:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202204201103.MeWPs1iv-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220419234637.357112-15-john.ogness@linutronix.de>

Hi John,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on 84d7df104dbab9c3dda8f2c5b46f9a6fc256fe02]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/John-Ogness/printk-for-next/20220420-080725
base:   84d7df104dbab9c3dda8f2c5b46f9a6fc256fe02
config: s390-randconfig-r032-20220419 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220420/202204201103.MeWPs1iv-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bac6cd5bf85669e3376610cfc4c4f9ca015e7b9b)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/5139c5b347088e124f3812a3fa63eb284b14f2dc
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review John-Ogness/printk-for-next/20220420-080725
        git checkout 5139c5b347088e124f3812a3fa63eb284b14f2dc
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/printk/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from kernel/printk/printk.c:35:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
   #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from kernel/printk/printk.c:35:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
   #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from kernel/printk/printk.c:35:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/printk/printk.c:2703:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'console_lock_single_hold' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   void console_lock_single_hold(struct console *con)
        ^
   kernel/printk/printk.c:2703:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
   void console_lock_single_hold(struct console *con)
   ^
   static 
   13 warnings generated.


vim +/console_lock_single_hold +2703 kernel/printk/printk.c

  2697	
  2698	/*
  2699	 * Lock the console_lock, but rather than blocking all the kthread printers,
  2700	 * lock a specified kthread printer and hold the lock. This is useful if
  2701	 * console flags for a particular console need to be updated.
  2702	 */
> 2703	void console_lock_single_hold(struct console *con)
  2704	{
  2705		might_sleep();
  2706		down_console_sem();
  2707		mutex_lock(&con->lock);
  2708		console_locked = 1;
  2709		console_may_schedule = 1;
  2710	}
  2711	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-20  4:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-19 23:46 [PATCH printk v3 00/15] printk/for-next John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 01/15] printk: rename cpulock functions John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 02/15] printk: cpu sync always disable interrupts John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 03/15] printk: add missing memory barrier to wake_up_klogd() John Ogness
2022-04-20 12:34   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 04/15] printk: wake up all waiters John Ogness
2022-04-20 12:36   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 05/15] printk: wake waiters for safe and NMI contexts John Ogness
2022-04-20 13:55   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 06/15] printk: get caller_id/timestamp after migration disable John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 07/15] printk: call boot_delay_msec() in printk_delay() John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 08/15] printk: add con_printk() macro for console details John Ogness
2022-04-20 14:01   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 09/15] printk: refactor and rework printing logic John Ogness
2022-04-20 14:55   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 10/15] printk: move buffer definitions into console_emit_next_record() caller John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 11/15] printk: add pr_flush() John Ogness
2022-04-20 15:10   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 12/15] printk: add functions to prefer direct printing John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 13/15] printk: add kthread console printers John Ogness
2022-04-20 17:53   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-20 20:02     ` John Ogness
2022-04-21 14:25       ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 14/15] printk: extend console_lock for proper kthread support John Ogness
2022-04-20  2:13   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-20 13:32     ` John Ogness
2022-04-20  4:04   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-04-21 12:41   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-21 14:30     ` John Ogness
2022-04-22 13:03       ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-22 14:14         ` John Ogness
2022-04-22 15:15           ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-22 21:25             ` John Ogness
2022-04-25 15:18               ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-25 19:10                 ` John Ogness
2022-04-19 23:46 ` [PATCH printk v3 15/15] printk: remove @console_locked John Ogness
2022-04-21 12:46   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-21 14:40 ` [PATCH printk v3 00/15] printk/for-next Petr Mladek
2022-04-21 15:02   ` John Ogness

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202204201103.MeWPs1iv-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox