From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Cc: Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@gmail.com>,
Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, phil@philpotter.co.uk,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] staging: r8188eu: remove unused member free_bss_buf
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:55:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220420115534.GF2951@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32587233-0ff6-ed0f-b873-cd4f797005a9@gmail.com>
As a kernel community, I don't think we are pro-active enough about
preventing bugs. One of my co-workers and I have started a bi weekly
phone call to look at CVEs from the previous week and discuss how they
could have been prevented or detected earlier. Of course, my solutions
are always centered around static analysis because that's my deal but
some bugs are caused by process issues, or could be detected with better
testing.
In this case there were two bugs proposed bugs.
1) The memory leak that Fabio noticed. Smatch is bad at detecting
memory leaks. It's a hard problem, because in this case it's
across function boundaries.
Fabio caught the leak. I don't know if I would have.
2) The NULL dereference.
The "&pnetwork->list" expression is not a dereference so this is also
a cross function thing. I thought I used to have an unpublished check
for bogus addresses like that where pnetwork is NULL.
Another is idea is that when you have pnetwork++ and it's a NULL
pointer then print an error message. Or even potentially NULL.
There are various heuristics to use which mean that "A reasonable
person would think this could be NULL".
Or another idea would be that we could test patches. Right now we
don't really have a way to test these. But, of course, we wish we
did.
It's not super likely that we would have committed the NULL deref
patch. I would have caught that one if you didn't and Fabio likely
would have as well. But I like to remove the human error whenever I
can.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-20 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-19 18:19 [PATCH v3 0/7] staging: r8188eu: fix warnings reported by checkpatch Jaehee Park
2022-04-19 18:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] staging: r8188eu: remove unused member free_bss_buf Jaehee Park
2022-04-19 19:27 ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-04-20 11:55 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2022-04-20 14:48 ` Jaehee Park
2022-04-20 17:39 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-04-22 16:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-04-20 16:33 ` Greg KH
2022-04-19 18:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] staging: r8188eu: remove spaces before tabs Jaehee Park
2022-04-19 18:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] staging: r8188eu: remove 'added by' author comments Jaehee Park
2022-04-19 18:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] staging: r8188eu: place constants on the right side of tests Jaehee Park
2022-04-19 18:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] staging: r8188eu: replace spaces with tabs Jaehee Park
2022-04-19 18:19 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] staging: r8188eu: correct typo in comments Jaehee Park
2022-04-19 18:19 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] staging: r8188eu: remove unused else condition Jaehee Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220420115534.GF2951@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jhpark1013@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox