From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8145BC433EF for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 05:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1384555AbiDUFue (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 01:50:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41692 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1384548AbiDUFub (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 01:50:31 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AC161208F for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 22:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 9154768B05; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 07:47:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 07:47:38 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Wang, Zhi A" Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Alex Williamson , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , "Vivi, Rodrigo" , Christoph Hellwig , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , "intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Zhenyu Wang Subject: Re: [PULL v2] gvt-next Message-ID: <20220421054738.GA20772@lst.de> References: <5a8b9f48-2c32-8177-1c18-e3bd7bfde558@intel.com> <20220420164351.GC2120790@nvidia.com> <20220420114033.7f8b57c7.alex.williamson@redhat.com> <20220420174600.GD2120790@nvidia.com> <20220420200034.GE2120790@nvidia.com> <55cb46db-754e-e339-178c-0a2cfaf65810@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55cb46db-754e-e339-178c-0a2cfaf65810@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 04:57:34AM +0000, Wang, Zhi A wrote: > Is it possible that I can send two different pull based on the same branch? > I was thinking I can remove this line in the original patch and then add a > small patch to add this line back on the top. Then make two different tags > before and after that small patch, send one pull with tag that includes that > small patch to i915 and the other pull with tag that doesn't includes it to > VFIO? Yes, you can do that as long as the small fixup commit is the very last one.