From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] fs: MNT_WRITE_HOLD fix
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:52:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220422105231.197721-1-brauner@kernel.org> (raw)
Hey Linus,
/* Summary */
The recent cleanup in e257039f0fc7 ("mount_setattr(): clean the control flow
and calling conventions") switched the mount attribute codepaths from do-while
to for loops as they are more idiomatic when walking mounts.
However, we did originally choose do-while constructs because if we request a
mount or mount tree to be made read-only we need to hold writers in the
following way: The mount attribute code will grab lock_mount_hash() and then
call mnt_hold_writers() which will _unconditionally_ set MNT_WRITE_HOLD on the
mount.
Any callers that need write access have to call mnt_want_write(). They will
immediately see that MNT_WRITE_HOLD is set on the mount and the caller will
then either spin (on non-preempt-rt) or wait on lock_mount_hash() (on
preempt-rt).
The fact that MNT_WRITE_HOLD is set unconditionally means that once
mnt_hold_writers() returns we need to _always_ pair it with
mnt_unhold_writers() in both the failure and success paths.
The do-while constructs did take care of this. But Al's change to a for loop in
the failure path stops on the first mount we failed to change mount attributes
_without_ going into the loop to call mnt_unhold_writers().
This in turn means that once we failed to make a mount read-only via
mount_setattr() - i.e. there are already writers on that mount - we will block
any writers indefinitely. Fix this by ensuring that the for loop always unsets
MNT_WRITE_HOLD including the first mount we failed to change to read-only. Also
sprinkle a few comments into the cleanup code to remind people about what is
happening including myself. After all, I didn't catch it during review.
This is only relevant on mainline and was reported by syzbot. Details about the
syzbot reports are all in the commit message.
/* Testing */
All patches are based on v5.18-rc3 and have been sitting in linux-next. No
build failures or warnings were observed. Syzbot was unable to reproduce the
issue with this patch applied.
/* Conflicts */
At the time of creating this PR no merge conflicts were reported from
linux-next and no merge conflicts showed up doing a test-merge with current
mainline.
The following changes since commit b2d229d4ddb17db541098b83524d901257e93845:
Linux 5.18-rc3 (2022-04-17 13:57:31 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
git@gitolite.kernel.org:pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux tags/fs.fixes.v5.18-rc4
for you to fetch changes up to 0014edaedfd804dbf35b009808789325ca615716:
fs: unset MNT_WRITE_HOLD on failure (2022-04-21 17:57:37 +0200)
Please consider pulling these changes from the signed fs.fixes.v5.18-rc4 tag.
Thanks!
Christian
----------------------------------------------------------------
fs.fixes.v5.18-rc4
----------------------------------------------------------------
Christian Brauner (1):
fs: unset MNT_WRITE_HOLD on failure
fs/namespace.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-22 10:52 Christian Brauner [this message]
2022-04-22 20:46 ` [GIT PULL] fs: MNT_WRITE_HOLD fix pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220422105231.197721-1-brauner@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox