public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: SVM: Stuff next_rip on emulated INT3 injection if NRIPS is supported
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 02:14:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220423021411.784383-5-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220423021411.784383-1-seanjc@google.com>

If NRIPS is supported in hardware but disabled in KVM, set next_rip to
the next RIP when advancing RIP as part of emulating INT3 injection.
There is no flag to tell the CPU that KVM isn't using next_rip, and so
leaving next_rip is left as is will result in the CPU pushing garbage
onto the stack when vectoring the injected event.

Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Fixes: 66b7138f9136 ("KVM: SVM: Emulate nRIP feature when reinjecting INT3")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 82175a13c668..14bc4e87437b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -392,6 +392,10 @@ static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		 */
 		(void)svm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
 		rip = kvm_rip_read(vcpu);
+
+		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS))
+			svm->vmcb->control.next_rip = rip;
+
 		svm->int3_rip = rip + svm->vmcb->save.cs.base;
 		svm->int3_injected = rip - old_rip;
 	}
@@ -3703,7 +3707,7 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	/*
 	 * If NextRIP isn't enabled, KVM must manually advance RIP prior to
 	 * injecting the soft exception/interrupt.  That advancement needs to
-	 * be unwound if vectoring didn't complete.  Note, the _new_ event may
+	 * be unwound if vectoring didn't complete.  Note, the new event may
 	 * not be the injected event, e.g. if KVM injected an INTn, the INTn
 	 * hit a #NP in the guest, and the #NP encountered a #PF, the #NP will
 	 * be the reported vectored event, but RIP still needs to be unwound.
-- 
2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-23  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-23  2:14 [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: SVM: Fix soft int/ex re-injection Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: nSVM: Sync next_rip field from vmcb12 to vmcb02 Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28  9:33   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: SVM: Don't BUG if userspace injects a soft interrupt with GIF=0 Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28  7:35   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-28 13:27     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-28 14:34       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-28 15:04         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28 16:33           ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: SVM: Unwind "speculative" RIP advancement if INTn injection "fails" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23  2:14 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction Sean Christopherson
2022-04-25 22:59   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-28  9:37   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-28 13:36     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-28 14:25       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: SVM: Re-inject INTn instead of retrying the insn on "failure" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: x86: Trace re-injected exceptions Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28  9:48   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: x86: Print error code in exception injection tracepoint iff valid Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28  9:49   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: x86: Differentiate Soft vs. Hard IRQs vs. reinjected in tracepoint Sean Christopherson
2022-04-25 22:59   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: selftests: nSVM: Add svm_nested_soft_inject_test Sean Christopherson
2022-04-25 23:00   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: SVM: Drop support for CPUs without NRIPS (NextRIP Save) support Sean Christopherson
2022-04-24  9:34   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-25 23:00   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-25 23:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: SVM: Fix soft int/ex re-injection Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-27 18:21   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220423021411.784383-5-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox