Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: selftest: Test suppression indication on key prot exception

Claudio Imbrenda
2022-04-25T13:48:08Z

On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:01:47 +0200
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Check that suppression is not indicated on injection of a key checked
> protection exception caused by a memop after it already modified guest
> memory, as that violates the definition of suppression.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> index b04c2c1b3c30..ce176ad9f216 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int err_memop_ioctl(struct test_vcpu vcpu, struct kvm_s390_mem_op *ksmo)
> #define SIDA_OFFSET(o) ._sida_offset = 1, .sida_offset = (o)
> #define AR(a) ._ar = 1, .ar = (a)
> #define KEY(a) .f_key = 1, .key = (a)
> +#define INJECT .f_inject = 1
>
> #define CHECK_N_DO(f, ...) ({ f(__VA_ARGS__, CHECK_ONLY); f(__VA_ARGS__); })
>
> @@ -430,9 +431,18 @@ static void test_copy_key_fetch_prot(void)
> TEST_ASSERT(rv == 4, "Should result in protection exception"); \
> })
>
> +static void guest_error_key(void)
> +{
> + GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_INITED);
> + set_storage_key_range(mem1, PAGE_SIZE, 0x18);
> + set_storage_key_range(mem1 + PAGE_SIZE, sizeof(mem1) - PAGE_SIZE, 0x98);
> + GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_SKEYS_SET);
> + GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_IDLED);
> +}
> +
> static void test_errors_key(void)
> {
> - struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_copy_key_fetch_prot);
> + struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_error_key);
>
> HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED);
> HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET);
> @@ -446,6 +456,36 @@ static void test_errors_key(void)
> kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
> }
>
> +static void test_termination(void)
> +{
> + struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_error_key);
> + uint64_t prefix;
> + uint64_t teid;
> + uint64_t psw[2];
> +
> + HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED);
> + HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET);
> +
> + /* vcpu, mismatching keys after first page */
> + ERR_PROT_MOP(t.vcpu, LOGICAL, WRITE, mem1, t.size, GADDR_V(mem1), KEY(1), INJECT);
> + /*
> + * The memop injected a program exception and the test needs to check the
> + * Translation-Exception Identification (TEID). It is necessary to run
> + * the guest in order to be able to read the TEID from guest memory.
> + * Set the guest program new PSW, so the guest state is not clobbered.
> + */
> + prefix = t.run->s.regs.prefix;
> + psw[0] = t.run->psw_mask;
> + psw[1] = t.run->psw_addr;
> + MOP(t.vm, ABSOLUTE, WRITE, psw, sizeof(psw), GADDR(prefix + 464));
> + HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_IDLED);
> + MOP(t.vm, ABSOLUTE, READ, &teid, sizeof(teid), GADDR(prefix + 168));
> + /* Bits 56, 60, 61 form a code, 0 being the only one allowing for termination */
> + ASSERT_EQ(teid & 0x4c, 0);
> +
> + kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
> +}
> +
> static void test_errors_key_storage_prot_override(void)
> {
> struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_copy_key_fetch_prot);
> @@ -668,6 +708,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> test_copy_key_fetch_prot();
> test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override();
> test_errors_key();
> + test_termination();
> test_errors_key_storage_prot_override();
> test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled();
> test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled();