[for-next][PATCH 19/21] ring-buffer: Simplify if-if to if-else

Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27T19:38:59Z

From: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>

Use if and else instead of if(A) and if (!A).

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220426070628.167565-1-wanjiabing@vivo.com

Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 05dfc7a12d3d..655d6db3e3c3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -6011,10 +6011,10 @@ static __init int test_ringbuffer(void)
pr_info(" total events: %ld\n", total_lost + total_read);
pr_info(" recorded len bytes: %ld\n", total_len);
pr_info(" recorded size bytes: %ld\n", total_size);
- if (total_lost)
+ if (total_lost) {
pr_info(" With dropped events, record len and size may not match\n"
" alloced and written from above\n");
- if (!total_lost) {
+ } else {
if (RB_WARN_ON(buffer, total_len != total_alloc ||
total_size != total_written))
break;
--
2.35.1